Love, C. (2005). Not in our country? A critique of the United States welfare system through the lens of China’s one child policy. Columbia Journal of Gender and Law, 14(2). 142-174. Retrieved May 21, 2010.
The article mainly focuses on the Family Planning Law in China and the laws in the United States regarding society welfare. Both the countries aim to eliminate poverty from the societies and encourage development and growth. The author of the article believes that some child laws have been violated in achieving a level of success in implementing welfare laws. Despite the efforts of the government, the people living below the poverty line are increasing each day in both the countries.
The children are punished for the decisions of their parents as they do not have a separate formal identification. The cap on the family size in the United States legislature does not allow a woman to bear as many children as she wishes. The government supports children in a family to a certain limit. However, after the reproductive cap has been crossed, the government does not provide any benefits to the child who has been born after the cap was crossed. These limitations on the reproductive choice of a woman demonstrate that the system if full of issues and inequalities. This is because the child who is born after the reproduction cap is not entitled to the support from the government that other children are enjoying.
Raghavan, R., Inoue, M., Ettner, S., Hamilton, B., & Landsverk, J. (2010). A Preliminary Analysis of the Receipt of Mental Health Services Consistent With National Standards Among Children in the Child Welfare System. American Journal of Public Health, 100(4), 742-749. Retrieved May 21, 2010 from Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection data.
In this article, the authors perform a research to find out whether the children in the child welfare system of the United States receive mental health care as the others receive. Data from the past three years was used to conduct the research and study. This data was collected from the National Survey for Child and Adolescent well-being. The sample size consisted of 3,802 individuals. The results showed that only half of the total sample size received mental health care that was consistent with a single national standard. However, there were only 10% of the total sample were fortunate enough to get health care which was consistent with all of the national standards. It was also found out that the older children were more likely to attract mental health care which is consistent with the national standards. Therefore the article concludes with the fact that the child welfare system in the Unites States is not working fairly and those who need the support are not getting it.
Dettlaff, A., de Haymes, M., Velazquez, S., Mindell, R., & Bruce, L. (2009). Emerging Issues at the Intersection of Immigration and Child Welfare: Results from a Transnational Research and Policy Forum. Child Welfare, 88(2), 47-67. Retrieved May 21, 2010, from Education Research Complete database.
The authors of this article intend to reveal the issues related to child welfare system that an immigrant family has to face while moving to the United States. Child permanency, safety and well being have become the major concerns of a family moving to the United States. The increasing numbers of immigrants in the past few years suggest an increase in contact and interaction with the child welfare system, but the numbers of immigrant children involved with the welfare system have not been measured.
The author of the article also believes that the immigrant children are more likely to live in poverty than the children of the natives. Moreover the authors reveal that the immigrant families in the United States are less likely to receive any financial benefits than the natives. The children that are related to the immigrant families are more likely to lack health insurance coverage than the native ones. These discrepancies in the child welfare system exist due to the fact that the parents of these immigrant children also do not have access to the benefits that a normal American would enjoy.