As reported by Fahy 2007 in the article found online this is a group that was established in Pennsylvania to support and initiate the use of modern technology equipment and facilities in the health care systems in Pennsylvania in handling of chronic diseases and the care of patients with chronic diseases. The members of the group include Marion Cowan, Bonnie Snyder, Miriam Lockhart, Pierina Debellis and Geri Carey. The group was formed by the governor of the state of Pennsylvania.
Stages of development of chronic care committee According to Levi (2001) groups undergo several stages while the members try to achieve their group and personal goals and objectives. In analyzing a group like chronic care committee the five basic stages of forming, storming, norming, performing and adjourning that groups undergo are examined as follows as a way to understand the stages of development of a group. Forming -This is the first stage when a group is being started and it involves people coming together.
They share on their own personal goals then come to agree on what they would like to achieve as a group, in some cases would come up with the name for their group like in this case the individuals called themselves chronic care committee working in Pennsylvania. It is also at this stage that the people who come together to form a group will decide on who they will choose as their leaders and for how long they expect to be together. Those that feel that they can rhyme with the interests of the members will decide to join the group.
The most important issues at this stage is to be able to develop trust for the other persons, having a natural attraction to other people who want to form the group, being able to cope with the rule that have been set sharing similar goals with the members. Members through several interactions together will be able share information and experience which will also mark the start of friendships within a group Levi (2001). Storming-As summarized in Wheelan (2005) the storming stage involves the beginning of differences among the group members.
For Chronic care committee the first conflict was experienced at Grace Hospital in Toronto where they were supposed to transform the facilities in that hospital without being given enough finances to carry out the task. Often such is likely to happen to any group as members try to identify well the others, coping with different personalities and some could be joining group with different motives which will cause conflicts amongst the members. Such conflicts should be handled in a right way by not blaming others as this is the stage that will help determine the strength of a given group.
Chronic care group had to deal with the challenges that they were facing in their first task in Grace Hospital where the hospital stopped the wages for the workers and for the new one they wanted them to be paid less. Their members rejected all that and their organization was closed for some time Wheelan (2005). Norming-This is when the group starts to establish again after having undergone their fist conflict, the level of commitment is determined here as the members gets to understand each other’s personality.
For chronic care when the government began to support them by offering the facilities they required like the beds and necessary funds they got involved much to the project of chronic diseases care in Pennsylvania. Performing- A stage when group commits its efforts to the well being of the group and they begin giving results of their activities. In chronic care committee the began their serious tasks in ensuring that the chronic care department was handling its objectives as the governor had set the objectives with the support they had from the government.
The group was carrying out serious campaigns against the cuts and the other support that the government was providing for the patients with chronic diseases Cole (2005) and Fahy (2007). Adjourning- After the group feels that they have accomplished their goals and objectives they separate at point and that is the stage of adjournment. The chronic care group then after accomplishing their duties started to withdraw the aid for the chronic beds they were giving then retrenched the workers they had employed instead started demanding that they be employed on a contract basis.
Structure of chronic care committee As stated in the article by Fahy found online the group is made 43 members who represent health insurance companies, hospitals, representatives from the government bodies and other representative groups. Dynamics of group behavior in chronic care committee The group members influenced the others to start carrying out demonstrations and campaigns that demanded the government to put more support for the chronic care project. When a person belongs to a group, such a group will influence the kind of activities that that individual will carry out.
The group will either determine the decisions that a person takes to be in a certain direction in which the group will accept as being right or describe what their members can do or cannot do. A group also seems to create a certain picture to a person to what is expected of that person, giving warnings when they see that their member is loosing focus on their objectives. It will create boundaries to the members concern who will be their friends and who are enemies Levi (2001). Word count 914 References
Daniel Levi (2001). Group dynamics for teams. Sage publishers. Marilyn B. Cole (2005). Group dynamics in occupational therapy: the theoretical basis and practice application of group intervention, 3rd edition. SLACK incorporated. Susan A. Wheelan (2005). The handbook of group research and practice. Sage publishers. Joe Fahy. Governor’s new chronic care group to focus on diabetes first. Monday, September 17, 2007. Pittsburgh Post-Gazette retrieved online http://www. postgazette. com/pg/07260/818177-114. stm
Courtney from Study Moose
Hi there, would you like to get such a paper? How about receiving a customized one? Check it out https://goo.gl/3TYhaX