The Ethics Awareness Inventory (EAI) is an instrument used to establish one’s different attitudes to different portions of ethical thought and behavior. According to The Williams Institute (2011), “Ethics Awareness Inventory is a powerful tool for developing ethical competency. Besides being an instructive personal ethics assessment instrument, the EAI is a practical and comprehensive ethics learning process composed of three sections: Ethical Awareness, Articulation and Application/Action”. (p. 1) The EAI establishes where one focus lies among the four categories regarding character, obligation, results, and equity.
Depending on the answers of the questions given one’s ethical leanings are evaluated (Ethics Awareness Inventory, 2011). Below one will learn the importance of understanding one’s personal ethical perspective, the relationship between personal and professional ethics in psychology, how the APA decision-making process facilitates more ethical professional behavior, and how one’s ethical awareness inventory scores relate to the concept of aspirational and enforceable standards.
Results of Inventory
After taking the EAI, I found that my personal outcome regarding my personal ethics perspectives are evenly focused on character, obligation, and results (Ethics Awareness Inventory, 2012). The summary segment of the EAI states my results point out a personal ethical confliction or deep control from exterior sources (Ethics Awareness Inventory, 2012). My perspective on the assorted results are that my thought process, when making an ethical decision, takes numerous dimensions of ethical thought for deliberation. Prior to understanding my personal ethics, my ethical decision was directed by a combination of critical thinking and gut feeling. After reviewing the philosophy of ethics, I looked back at why I made certain decisions. I now believe taking a methodical approach to ethical decisions permits an individual to cautiously think about the many possible outcomes of decisions made and actions taken.
From job-related experiences, when I am placed into situations with individuals who have different ethics from me, I cautiously take steps to determine ethical dilemmas choices without violating the rights or opinions of all involved. In addition, the experiences working with teams at work, have taught me to carefully view the opinions of others before entering into open disagreement over a given course of action. I strongly believe, apart from the ethical position,. an individual has his or her individual right to express their opinion. The results of my EAI, combined with my experiences throughout school and work, have educated me that all ethical decisions require cautious thought. I firmly believe, in order to achieve the best results, one needs to take numerous factors including but limited to culture, into consideration while also allowing for future implications of any action dictated by ethical decisions I make.
Ethical Professional Behavior
The EAI indicates that ethical guidelines have changed from individual character to organizational ethics (Ethics Awareness Inventory, 2011). The prime focus of this change are client-patient relationships in psychological counseling and clinical practice (Fisher, (2013). Psychological counseling and clinical practice are both constructed on ethical guidelines with the possibility for misuse of power and negligence to discretion (Fisher, (2013). My Results-centered approach to psychology would deem that the actions of the clinician must be in formation with ethical guidelines of the clinician. Furthermore, my ethical perspective shows that the ethical guidelines that lie beneath the practice of psychology should try to find the best good for the greatest part of society (Ethics Awareness Inventory, 2012). One issue in ethics are that ethics cease from a philosophical outlook to a practical discipline once personal ethics are fully developed (Barker, 1997).
Many times personal ethics are articulated through words and action impacting daily routines (Barker, 1997).Many individuals are focused on producing solutions when faces with a issue and discouraged from complaining or disregarding the issue at hand. Personal ethics establish individual virtues and defend individuals from external based vices like power or money (Barker, 1997). The code in ethical standards stresses more on ethical aspects on the connection connecting a psychologist’s personal and professional, or occupational life. Personal ethical standards determine how psychologists understand the relationship between what takes place at their work work-related and nonworking-related lives (Ethics Awareness Inventory, 2011).
In case of personal troubles, the psychologists commonly evades starting an activity if there is substantial proof that his or her personal tribulations will obstruct them from competently performing and accomplishing his or her job-related duties (Ethics Awareness Inventory, 2011) Because of previous knowledge on negative influence that dilemmas may create, psychologists adjust fitting measures to boost his or her success (Barker, 1997). There are many strategies to help one’s goal achievement.
For example, receiving professional consultation, choosing whether to limit or adjust the behavior, suspend or cease his or her job- related responsibilities (Barker, 1997). Moreover, ethical standards require the minimum standard of behavior and is positioned to ensure affected individuals evade initiating his or her activity by reason of personal issues, obstructing personal competence, and performance in professional correlated activities (Barker, 1997).
Aspirational And Enforceable Standards
There is a dramatic relationship linking ethical awareness inventory scores and the idea of aspiration and enforceable standards (Miller, & Salkind, 2003). While ethical standards aim for implementing acceptable behavior within all fields of life, EAI scores determine there existing various challenges to its implementation (Miller, & Salkind, 2003). An individual faces many different frustrations in the course of addressing ethical dilemmas. The choice assumed to be correct in most cases is never the best choice for the supported organization; therefore, it does not benefit the individual making the decision.
In addition, A cost benefit analysis instrument is said to be unsuitable in addressing issues; however, it is the most fitting instrument in various organizations (Barker, 1997). Believing in a moral responsibility of doing what is said to be correct and recommended leaves not enough room for negotiations upon violation of ethical duties (Barker, 1997). Regardless of of the different beliefs, it is vital each individual has an obligation and responsibility.
With the above information one can see the importance of understanding personal ethical perspectives, the relationship between personal and professional ethics in psychology, how the APA decision-making process facilitates more ethical professional behavior, and how one’s ethical awareness inventory scores relate to the concept of aspirational and enforceable standards. Personal ethics are essential in understanding the source of a dilemma. personal ethics can help everyone involved to develop and find the best solution and instruments needed. When one understands one’s personal ethical perspective it can help gaining ones trust by describing what is wrong and right. Unsuccessful guidance can start from one not able to understand personal ethics. Ethics can provide a sense of truth and offer the guidelines to follow; which in turn can, can create good leadership and management that can help in development of better companies and society.
Barker, R. A. (1997). How can we train leaders if we do not know what leadership is? Human Relations, 50(4), 343-362. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/231429531?accountid=458 Ethics Awareness Inventory, 2011. For Ethics and Management. Retrieved from http://www.ethics-twi.org/Public/Home/index.cfm Ethics Awareness Inventory, 2012. A Guide to Personal Awareness of Your Ethical Perspective and Style. Retrieved from https://ecampus.phoenix.edu/secure/aapd/Vendors/TWI/EAI/ Ethics: What Is Right? Films On Demand. Films Media Group, 2004. Retrieved from . Fisher, C.B. (2013). Decoding the ethics code: A practical guide for psychologists (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Joyce, N. R., & Rankin, T. J. (2010). The Lessons of the Development of the First APA Ethics Code: Blending Science, Practice, and Politics. Ethics & Behavior, 20(6), 466-481. Miller, D. C., & Salkind, N. J. (2003). ETHICAL PRACTICES IN RESEARCH. In , Handbook of Research Design & Social Measurement (pp. 100-141).