sample
Haven't found the Essay You Want?
For Only $12.90/page

Essay, Siegfried Sassoon Essay

Analyse how language used intensified the message of the written text(s). In both poem ‘Does it Matter?’ and ‘Survivors’ the poet, Siegfried Sassoon is able to intensify the message of the non-combatants misunderstanding of the realities of war. This was by Sassoon using different language techniques such as rhetorical question, repetition and onomatopoeia. Rhetorical question is used to intensify the message of the non-combatants misunderstanding of the realities of war in the poem ‘Does it matter?’ by Siegfried Sassoon. Asking ‘does it matter’ reflects that the non-combatants are unable to see the true affects the war has caused the soldiers. This intensifies the message of the non-combatants misunderstanding of the realities of war because it does matter that the soldier lost their legs, their sight and every night having dreams from the pit. The non-combatants however were unable to understand what the war victims endure for their country. Onomatopoeia is also used in the poem ‘Does it Matter’ to intensify the message of the non-combatants misunderstanding of the realities of war Sassoon used the word ‘gobble’ to show that the non-combatants act like children, ignorant and unaffected by the realities of war.

This idea is also shown in ‘Base Details’ also by Siegfried Sassoon where the poet uses the words ‘toddle’ and ‘guzzling and gulping’ to describe how a major acts child-like and non-serious. This intensifies the message of the misunderstanding of the realities of war because it shows that the non-combatants act greedy and selfish towards the soldiers who fought in the war. In the poem ‘Survivors’ repetition is used to intensify the message of the non-combatants misunderstanding of the realities of war When Sassoon says ‘they’ll soon get well,’ ‘they’re longing to go out again,’ they’ll soon forget’ and ‘they’ll be proud’ it shows an impersonal distant regard the non-combatants have for the soldiers and their horrible suffering in the war. This intensifies the message of the misunderstanding of the realities of war because it shows that the non-combatants give a misleading hope to the shell shock soldiers that they will soon recover, when really there is no quick recovery from the damage the war has inflicted on the soldiers. Onomatopoeia also gets used in ‘Survivors’ to intensify the message of the non-combatant misunderstanding of the realities of war ‘Stammering disconnected talk’ highlight the difficulty the soldiers have with talking. This intensify the message of the non-combatant misunderstanding of the realities of war because it shows that the soldiers view of war is disconnected from the non-combatants view of war, as the soldiers have been through what the war is really like. In conclusion ‘Does it Matter?’ and ‘Survivors’ by Siegfried Sassoon, both intensify the message of the non-combatants misunderstanding of the realities of war through the language techniques of rhetorical question, repetition and onomatopoeia. Overall, I feel sorry for the soldier because they came back from the war and how to endure the non-combatants lack of understanding towards the traumatic events the soldiers went through.


Essay Topics:


Sorry, but copying text is forbidden on this website. If you need this or any other sample, we can send it to you via email. Please, specify your valid email address

We can't stand spam as much as you do No, thanks. I prefer suffering on my own

Courtney from Study Moose

Hi there, would you like to get such a paper? How about receiving a customized one? Check it out https://goo.gl/3TYhaX