Welfare is a tax payer sponsored program that gives financial benefits to underprivileged families. With a sizable number of families using the government issued money to fuel their substance abuse, naturally this would spark an outrage from the tax payers and politicians. Drug testing recipients of welfare is currently the only reasonable solution to pacify the controversy at hand. The idea of drug testing welfare recipients before and during their receiving of welfare could potentially have economic and domestic benefits, therefore should be federally enforced throughout the entirety of the United States.
The United States welfare system has been full of flaws since it was created. Some presidents such as Ronald Reagan and Bill Clinton have pushed for some kind of welfare reform. In Regan’s “Welfare Reform” speech he called for a “reshape of our welfare system so that it can be judged by how many how many Americans it makes independent off welfare.” (President Ronald Reagan speaks on welfare reform). From when he started running for office, he was not a firm believer in the welfare system the United States was running. Reagan also believed that if changed were not made it would create “a permanent culture of poverty as inescapable as any chain or bond” (President Ronald Reagan speaks on welfare reform).
Even liberals, such as former President Bill Clinton, believed a reform for welfare was necessary. His most known contribution to the welfare reform was the “passing of a sweeping reform bill in 1996” (The Clinton Presidency). Clinton came up with a welfare reformation bill which was considered his biggest contribution to welfare reform than any other president in the last decade of the twentieth century. The “Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Act” that Clinton passed “ required welfare recipients to find jobs and aimed to move poor people off welfare and into the work place” (The Clinton Presidency). Attempts to successfully reform welfare by both presidents were both unsuccessful over all, however drug testing welfare recipients could provide the solution to The United States welfare system’s flawed system.
Like every argument, there are two sides to drug testing welfare recipients. The American Civil Labor Union is completely against the idea of drug testing. The American Civil Labor Union “claims that the programs violate constitutional rights to privacy as well as the fourth amendment” (Testing welfare recipients for drugs). The fourth amendment protects any unlawful search and seizure, “therefore being unconstitutional if the fourth amendment means anything” (Federal appeals court upholds injunction against welfare). The American Civil Labor Union also claims that drug testing reciepents of welfare may not be as beneficial as Republicans might think.
Many critics believe that “drug testing programs are costly and ineffective (Welfare drug testing). Most unionized corporations such as The American Civil Labor Union have similar beliefs when it comes to drug testing welfare recipients. The American Civil Labor Union also believes negatively about drug testing recipients of welfare for “conducting strict testing on welfare recipients could result in families having no income at all” (Welfare drug testing). Despite the counterargument put up by The American Civil Labor Union and other critics, the pros of drug tests out weight the cons of drug testing.
The benefits that would come from drug testing could be beneficial economically and domestically for the families on welfare. The government is always looking for ways to save money. Drug testing could save the government money “as welfare approached one trillions dollars a year. (Welfare drug testing). The amount of money the United states government spends on welfare each year is appalling, especially with the growing amount of debt the United states is slowly starting to accrue. With the potential savings in “drug testing measures will conserve government resources in a time of fiscal need” (Welfare drug testing). If drug tests are enforced it could potentially utilize the tax payers dime to be distributed more efficiently. Most tax paying citizens would agree with republicans who believe that “it is unfair to for hardworking Americans to subsidize who break laws and take illicit substances.” (Welfare-to-work).
Most conservatives in the United States government believe that the idea of using some other tax paying citizens money to fuel their drug habits is just plain wrong. Republicans also believe that recipients should “engage in responsible and constructive behavior as a condition of receiving aid. Requiring recipients to stop using illegal drugs is a core element of reciprocal obligation.” (Other uses for drug testing). Some argue drug testing welfare recipients is considered unconstitutional, but has been viewed other wise in court of law in some situations. In 2002 “a three panel judge panel on the Federal Sixth Circuit of appeals in Ohio reversed” (welfare-to-work), a ruling of unconstitutional in the Ohio court of law. This decision had reversed the decision of other judges that deemed drug testing welfare recipients unconstitutional. The three judge panel concluded that “Children in needy families, guarding public safety, and ensuring tax payer funds were responsibly spent justified all drug tests” (welfare-to-work). With the potential benefits from drug testing recipients, the welfare system could be forever fixed of problems with the system.
The modern day welfare system has its good and bad sides. There is good potential that the future is bright, but the homelives of the underprivileged families is devastating. How the United states regulates welfare has sparked political debate that has slowly transformed into a mutual agreement being supported by Republicans and Democrats. The majority of Republicans believing that “drug abuse is considered a major problem for the poor” (Testing welfare recipients for drugs) Even though the United States has been polically split into parties that seem to hardly ever agree on a topic since almost the beginning of the countries birth, this is something they can somewhat agree on. Studies show such testing is generally supported by conservatives, and a growing number of Liberals also back the test.” (Testing welfare recipients for drugs).
But not everything is looking bring in welfare’s modern situation; statistics show “an estimate of 20% of the 3.7 million families that receive welfare benefits in the United States are headed by a substance abuse problem” (Testing welfare recipients for drugs).What should be thrived for with the drug testing of welfare recipients shouldn’t been mainly about saving money, but more about the families and children in the under privileged homes. Drug testing welfare recipients could encourage them to seek help and to “help ensure that children in impoverished families are growing up in save environments” (Update: Welfare Reform). The modern welfare situation has politicians form both parties taking initiative in solving the problems welfare currently posses.
People have been searching for years to solve the welfare problem . From presidents and congressmen of both parties, nothing has been conclusive. However, there is a sufficient amount of evidence that suggests drug testing recipients of welfare could really be effective in effort to reform the United States welfare program to run more effectively and help addicts in the process. If drug testing to revive welfare was enacted, not only would the lives of many addicts on welfare’s lives be changed but there are also some very good economical bonuses that the United States could really use with the current economy. With the evidence and the argument making the drug tests of the recipients constitutional, federal enforcement of welfare drug testing should be put into regulation.