Knowledge and education around type one and type II diabetes permits the individual to live a productive life. Knowledge of the condition known are pre-diabetes is not largely know within the United Kingdom. The study (Troughton, Jarvisa, Skinner, Robertson, Khunti, & Davies, 2008) examines the feeling of the individual upon his or her s diagnosis of not knowing about the pre-diabetic condition. The study reviews information relating to the patients uncertainties of the diagnosis and his and her concerns regarding his or her long-term health.
Data collection methods
Data collection procedures:
Data collection for this study permits for the descriptive statistics to describe the patient experience about his or her diagnosis of pre-diabetes. Permitting the research subject to express his or her experience in this semi-structure interview process permits the focusing on the content of the patients’ experience (Troughton, Jarvisa, Skinner, Robertson, Khunti, & Davies, 2008).
Protecting the rights of subjects:
Obtaining informed consent from the research subjects provided the appropriate steps to ensure the rights of the research subjects. This crucial documentation is vital to the education of the subjects to ensure that they can reach a truly informed decision about whether or not to participate in the research. This informed consent when given freely without pressure from outside sources to participate ensures the willingness of the participation involvement in the study.
Tools used to support the reliability and validity of the study: Use of the framework method of qualitative analysis, package QSR n6 (NUD x IST) (Troughton, Jarvisa, Skinner, Robertson, Khunti, & Davies, 2008) toolkit version six provided the framework for data collection. The toolkit provides tools to classify, arrange, and sort data permitting more time for analyzing the data gathered (QSR International, 2012). The tool permits the identification of common themes within the gathered data. Analyzing information of gathered data using the toolkit enables the development of a conclusion based on facts.
Data analysis procedures
Data analysis procedures:
The functionality in the QSR n6 (NUD x IST) toolkit enables the development of connections and relationships within the data gathered from participates. Framework charts identifying themes of the patient knowledge of the seriousness and action to take to help prevent the escalation of his or her diagnosis permits a detail conclusion to the study. Validation of the data occurred in feedback sessions.
Answering the research question using data analyzing:
The main question of the research is that “Do individuals diagnosed with the condition known as pre-diabetes know about the seriousness of his or her condition?” The data analysis procedure are appropriate because the descriptive approach to gathering the data permitted the research to rely on responses on the feeling of participates about his or her experience of his or her pre-diabetic diagnosis.
Using qualitative and quantitative data:
Difference in the approach of using qualitative and quantitative data collection methods intertwined in this research. The qualitative research method of gathering data on the feeling of the individual upon his or her diagnosis developed the base of the study. Providing the data to the toolkit indicated the common themes identified in the study that may lead to the creation of survey questions. These survey questions when delivered to a larger population will provide an inferential statistics that helps to determine a direction of developing education about the pre-diabetic illness.
Patients in the United Kingdom have little or no education or knowledge of the pre-diabetic condition, intervention in educating the population about it is a major concern for the health care professionals of the United Kingdom. This research identified areas and methods to help construct useful programs to educate the patient diagnosed with the condition. These seven points range from follow-up care after initial diagnosis to minimizing the patients misunderstanding of the condition. The study also provides suggestion on how physicians may optimize care for providing patients diagnosed with the condition
Scientific merit strengths and weaknesses:
Key psychological appraisals of the study played a key dimension on developing planning for the illness of pre-diabetic condition. Results from study developed an understanding of the type of educational programs and communication development will help patients understand the illness and how vital it is to control the situation before it develops into a more serious illness. Identification of the condition before the condition develops into type-II diabetes is a weakness in the study. This weakness leads to the condition that the finding of the study does not take into effect the larger population of the UK that may know about the condition. Consulting with the large population of the UK undoubtedly will result in a more detailed finding.
Limitations and weaknesses of the scientific merit of this study:
The size of the research group was a major limitation to the effect of the research study. Focusing on the small group of subjects prevents a larger understanding of the condition throughout the United Kingdom. Pre-diagnosed individuals took part in the study, this provides a limitation on the results because time passed providing the individual more time to think about his or her answer to questions. This resulting in a more thought out response to the questions than of those individuals who may not had time to think about the diagnosis.
Support of the findings:
The findings supported the initial question of “Do individuals diagnosed with the condition known as pre-diabetes know about the seriousness of his or her condition?” Qualitative data supported that finding indicating that individual when asked if he or she is aware of the condition that he or she did not know that it existed. Furthered detail data analyzing indicates that a more proactive approach to educating individual about the condition during annual checkups will educate the patients on the existence of the condition.
QSR International. (2012, Spring). What is qualitative research? Retrieved from http://www.qsrinternational.com/what-is-qualitative-research.aspx Troughton, J., Jarvisa, J., Skinner, C., Robertson, N., Khunti, K., & Davies, M. (2008, July). Waiting for diabetes: Perceptions of people with pre-diabetes: A qualitative study. Patient Education and Counseling, 72(1), 88-93. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com.ezproxy.apollolibrary.com/science/article/pii/S0738399108000761?np=y