Food shortage is one effect of poverty. But this situation sounds true to those who cannot afford to feed themselves. There are many families in poverty-stricken inner cities that can hardly eat three (3) times a day. In view of this, the impact of climate change as well as the high demand of bio-fuels caused the food scarcity (“Global Food Shortage”). Scarce resources for the production of food added to the problem. In addition to that, there is a great development of the living standards of the people that they tend to eat more than needed.
While wealthy families eat more than they should due to surplus of food supply, the poor always claim more food for their tables. However, there is also decline in consumption due to the rising prices of foods. Those who can afford to buy food limit their food consumption due to increase of prices. So then, how about those who cannot afford? What will happen to them? Another view to be gleaned is the change of family structure in the society. Divorce, the loss of breadwinner, and the addition of a new mouth to feed can precipitate the fall below the poverty line (Ashman and Hull, 1999, p.
356). The truth is, unmarried women and their children greatly outnumber the elderly among the ranks of the poor. This is because the reality is that having children out of wedlock is the superhighway to poverty. Single parents could experience hardship in raising their own children alone. They can also experience difficulties in juggling their time to care for their children and to earn a living. When parents are granted divorce, the tendency is availability of support for the children is greatly affected.
As a result, lack of sufficient food to feed the children will occur. Let us take a closer look of a situation that involves an actual inner city family. For instance, an actual inner city family is composed of a father, mother, and five children. This family lives in a suburban apartment wherein the area is congested and overpopulated. At first, the family lives as if everything is fine and financial independence is not an issue. Later on, the father becomes irresponsible of his duties in the family.
The mother, on the other hand, always nags the husband to the point that they decided to get divorced. When the divorce decree was finally granted, care for the children was assigned to the mother while the father was obliged to give support. But there times that the said support of the father is not enough. Thus, it is incumbent upon the mother to look for extra income to support the five children. The mother tried to juggle work and family duties like care for and rearing of the children.
Since the mother cannot perfectly do such a hard role, one of the children resorted to truancy in school that added to the problem. The children no longer eat the right kinds of foods and suffer stress all the time. This actual family was affected by the situation that was brought by the dynamic society as well as the individual decisions of the parents involved. Now, how do we view family values of the family in relation to food shortage and other related problems? We hope to instill on the minds of the parents that their role in setting good example to their children is important.
The value of integrity and compassion are the things that make a marriage work such that divorce can be prevented if the same values are enriched in the families. Actual families in cities needs guidance and assistance by the government that divorce and unwanted pregnancy can be prevented. For all we know having children outside marriage causes poverty and the most to be affected are the children who are so innocent of the situation. What about perceived families on inner cities and their values? When we say perception, we tend to hope for a better family life.
We wanted to come up with thinking that family values can still be instilled in the minds of our children despite the dynamic changes of the society. It is not guesswork to say that the situations accorded to actual families do not happen to perceived families as it is far-reaching truth nowadays. The congested areas of suburban and urban communities will affect the value enrichment for families since the surroundings are not conducive for learning. The constant noise of the city streets and the quest for a better living results to rejection of family values.
For perceived families on the inner city, there is no way out of poverty but to do wrong if that would be the ultimate answer to poverty. Aside from that, optimism is not valued by perceived families on inner cities. Come to think of the scarcity of resources and unemployment problems that will affect individual families that alone could lessen adopting family values particularly being optimistic. The value of integrity as mentioned is not an item for perceived families considering that the environment that they belong demands shrewdness rather than honesty.
Survival of a family member depends upon its ability to clever in its dealings with other people. For example, perceived family members on inner cities especially their children could commit stealing of food products just to feed themselves. This scenario is what makes a congested area to be a place that decent living is out of question. Hence, there is no greater difference between views on actual families and perceived families on inner cities in relation to food shortage and other related problems.
Courtney from Study Moose
Hi there, would you like to get such a paper? How about receiving a customized one? Check it out https://goo.gl/3TYhaX