The key issue in the comic strip is Anita’s dilemma of succumbing to Tanya’s persuasion to manipulate her salary quite like what she has been doing. Anita suspended judgment before taking a position as depicted by her words, “I dunno. Sounds risky,” and “I’ll have to think about it,” which only means she took a moment to analyze what she would do. Anita then took a position in accordance to her moral judgment. This is because she based her decision of divulging Tanya’s actions on whether it was right or wrong, regardless if she was her friend.
She solved her dilemma, made a decision, and then took action as a result of her position because after thinking about the situation, she called HR and did not give in to cheating even if she had no money left. Part B My friend asked me to help her get back at this girl whom her ex-boyfriend was dating. Her plan of attack was exciting but when she asked me, “Are you in? ” I stepped back and said I had to see first since I have class. I suspended judgment as I needed to think if her actions were appropriate.
After a few hours, I called her ex-boyfriend and asked him to take the girl somewhere else. Without revealing why, I told him it was for the best; he agreed. I then called my friend and told her I cannot make it. I took a position and made an action I thought was necessary based on my moral beliefs. I realized it was wrong for my friend to take out her anger on an innocent girl. Later that night, she called and said she failed since she did not see them. SECTION TWO
According to legal analyst Dahlia Lithwick, there is a growing trend of going away from lethal injection or capital punishment in a lot of states, or at least reviewing their laws on death penalty (as cited in NPR, 2007). I, for one, am part of this population who does not believe in capital punishment. Even if Lithwick confirmed that two-thirds of Americans support death penalty for murderers, I do not see it as the solution to the prevalence of crime and criminal elements in the society because the said practice is tainted with irreversible human error, with racial and economic prejudice, and with the question of morality.
One of the popular questions that should not go unnoticed in the capital punishment debate is that “Are we a hundred percent certain that we are sentencing the correct human being? ” Take for instance the case of Cameron Todd Willingham, executed for arson in February 2004. While Texas fire investigators ruled that the blaze in Willingham’s house, which killed his three children, was indeed arson, a nationally known fire scientist recently stated that there was no evidence revealing that the fire was set; it might have been an accident and not a crime (Mills, 2009).
In this sense, the justice system may be flawed and erroneous, putting an end to the life of an innocent man. Luckily, for the 138 lives that have been freed from death row since 1973 with evidence proving their innocence, they can now enjoy the taste of freedom; yet, it is too unfortunate for the innocent lives waiting for their days’ end (DPIC, 2010). Hence, because of the possible human error in the imposition of death penalty, victims are uncertain if it was genuine justice that was served to them after all.
Similarly, defendants and their families are left to accept the irreversible and unfortunate fate. Furthermore, I do not support death penalty because of proof showing that several convictions have been stained with racial bias. According to the U. S. General Accounting Office, there has been a pattern of evidence signifying racial inequalities in the charging, sentencing, and imposition of capital punishment. The said report further claimed that a defendant is more likely to be charged with death penalty if the murder victim was white.
In addition, African-Americans are treated more badly if they were on the defense side and their lives have not been given high value when they are the victims (as cited in Amnesty International USA, 2010). Given this, where then is justice and equality in the justice system? If this has been the situation ever since, then the trust and confidence that citizens have for fair trials may likewise see their days’ end. Consequently, since the system may be infected with biases and prejudices, there is no guarantee that a fair, honest, and credible trial will be held.
Similarly, I do not approve of capital punishment because of the question on morality. As Last (2007) noted, when all other arguments opposing capital punishment fails, the moral ground may endure. Simply put, death penalty or the taking of the life of an alleged criminal is wrong. By ending the life of a human being, the state mistakenly holds divine authority and power into its own hands, which should not be. Hence, it is the citizens and legislators who have the responsibility to iterate that capital punishment is simply not a good thing.
No other human being should therefore be accorded the right to take the life of another, not now, not ever. All these reasons – human error that puts to death an innocent man, racial disparities that favors whiteness in the supposedly fair and just courts, and the question of whether it is right or wrong to end the life of a wrongdoer – are important points that should not be overlooked in the debate on capital punishment. Indeed, many lives have been sacrificed just to serve justice to the victims; many more, guilty or innocent, will be on death row if capital punishment lives on.
References Amnesty International USA. (2010). Death penalty and race. Retrieved from http://www. amnestyusa. org/death-penalty/death-penalty-facts/death-penalty-and-race/page. do? id=1101091 DPIC. (2010). Innocence and the death penalty. Death Penalty Information Center. Retrieved from http://deathpenaltyinfo. org/innocence-and-death-penalty Last, J. V. (2007). Last: Morality is the best argument against capital punishment. National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers. Retrieved from http://www.
nacdl. org/public. nsf/defenseupdates/deathpenalty140 Mills, S. (2009, August 25). Cameron Todd Willingham case: Expert says fire for which father was executed was not arson. Chicago Tribune. Retrieved from http://articles. chicagotribune. com/2009-08-25/news/0908240429_1_cameron-todd-willingham-texas-forensic-science-commission-willingham-case NPR. (2007). Florida mulls lethal-injection problems. Day to Day. Retrieved from http://www. npr. org/templates/transcript/transcript. php? storyId=7382349