Eugene Linden in the Time magazine article “Can Animals Think? ” claims that animals can think. They will probably do their best thinking when it serves their purpose, not when some scientist asked them. Linden supports his argument by describing, using anecdotes, how animals use intelligence to benefit themselves. The author’s purpose is to point out how animals use their intelligence so the writer may gain insight into animals their awry. The author writes in informative tone for time magazine.
I I learned that animals can use deception and trickery. This article, “Can Animals Think? ” is important because they know how and when do their needs. Linden stated, “It was the wire lock pick, bent to fit between his lip and gum and stowed there between escapes. ” This illustrates that the orangutan tried to escape using his abilities. Linden also stated, “But the next time the weather was nice, Fu Manchu escaped again. ” This points out that animals can think for their own purposes.
I I believe that Eugene Linden’s article “Can Animals Think? ” is related to Richard Connell’s “The Most Dangerous Game” because both texts show the reason and instinct are two different things, these two pieces of writing assimilates that it can tell the same story but in different ways. For example in Linden’s article “Animals are more than wind-up toys that blinding respond to tempting treats” and in Connell’s short story, “The animal has nothing but his legs and his instinct” both shows a wrong way to judge animals.