Nature, in its core function, is the cause and effect relationship offered to things with “ascertainable objectivity”, happening without cause. From this we can easily conclude that the state of the nature of something that something being an object with “thing-hood”, as humorously described in class is its beginning purpose and generality. There are a few debatable definitions of nature, which at first glance are very similar. On hand, we have nature that is described as “the first, inchoate, thing belonging to it”. To put in simply an object’s nature is its core material for example, the nature of my Odd Future Fitted tee-shirt is Cotton.
As well we have nature described as quote on quote “the shape or look”. This statement points to nature as the stereo-type or look of an object, for example, my MacBook does not have the nature of a MacBook unless it assumes the look of a generic looking MacBook. When looking at these definitions it is hard to find a large degree of difference as the “stereo-typical” MacBook is not only composed of parts generally used to construct a MacBook, but also its acceptance and appearance as a MacBook. For clarification we can use Aristotle’s example of a doctor healing himself.
A artisan of medicine does not have the nature of a Healer, as that would imply that he attained this skill naturally, which is not true. For something to have nature said nature must come into being without cause. Therefor it is safe to assume that the Healer, whom is an artisan of medicine, is a Healer, but has the nature of a normal very day human. When speaking of “nature” Aristotle means the natures of particular things and would perhaps be better translated “a nature a things”. What causes differences amongst Laptops and people, even between two Healers? This can be answered by looking at chance.
By chance variations are made upon things not to its nature, but to its physical or otherwise growth from its nature. For this reason we must assume that all things have a categorical nature, with variations to its structure. The term “purpose’ can be applied to the science of nature because purpose is an integral part of nature its self. One can come to the conclusion that nature, being the first being “thing-hood” of an object, is parallel to its purpose by definition. Under these thoughts we inclusively described nature as the original cause or purpose of an object, with relation to its makeup, compositions and molecular materials.
The grammatically correct sentence “Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo” which means Buffalo New York bison, whom other Buffalo bison bully, themselves bully Buffalo New York Bison. This statement really speaks to the nature of words in the English language. Nature can be defined as living things in the natural world such as Animals, Humans, Plants, Protista, Fungus, and, various others. Theses thing are often associated with the natural world, one thing that is often called unnatural are the actions of humans, such as the making of plastic or unstable isotopes and mechanical constructs.
Is it unnatural for humans to fly around in giant metal contraptions, is it natural to be able to cancel or postpone the effects of disease, is it unnatural to stop a potential pregnancy with just one pill, these are questions that one should ask when discussing the definition of nature or even human nature. According to the dictionary’s definition of nature, humans are a part of nature. If this is true, then one can ascertain that all acts of the humans behaviors are quote on quote natural and will lead to natural consequences.
What is the nature of humankind, many different philosophers during the renaissance have explored this thought. According to Wikipedia “the distinguishing characteristics, including ways of thinking, feeling acting and reacting, that humans tend to have by their nature, independently of the influence of culture”. In the eyes of Merriam-Webster “human nature is the fundamental disposition and traits of humans, theories about the nature of humankind form a large part of every culture”. It can be said that the nature of humans is that of a selfish, competitive, very social or altruistic.
Some may even say that the true nature of humans is that of a selfish yet remarkably smart ape that is bent on destroying itself, or that they are the one true guardians of the planet earth, sent here by some unknown force to protect and safe guard for generations to come. Most people believe that humans were created by God, and can go through immense improvement if economical, and social conditions were reformed so that hunger, death, and disease could be wiped off the face of the earth. There are lots of people that would argue that nature of humans is innately bad.
Looking throughout history there are a plethora of accounts in which humans have shown the less “admirable” side of our nature. It can be said that it is quite natural for humans to kill and degrade the lives of other human (it does happen on a regular bases). Humans in their natural state have a tendency for greed and selfish behavior, a need to satisfy their own wants and desires; which often comes at the expense of other living things, human or animal. Of course since Man is a part of nature, and there for all his action are natural, one can’t really say that these attributes are particularly good or bad they are natural.
Courtney from Study Moose
Hi there, would you like to get such a paper? How about receiving a customized one? Check it out https://goo.gl/3TYhaX