Every upstanding individual who lays a foot onto the airport floor wants to remain safe. Consequently, that devastating day of September 11, 2001 instilled the fear of flying in many Americans. This gave our nation the need to reevaluate airport checkpoints in order to secure the safety of the people of our country from those who are not sympathetic to our American ways. Some find that the measures the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) has taken in the recent years are unjust and a violation of many rights that we have by living in our free country.
The reason that some of these rights have been taken away is only beneficial to the protection of our homeland. I propose that in order to give passengers a better experience, the up and coming technologies such as Thermal Lie Detection and “all in one screening” need to be implemented as soon as they become available. With these new methods, passengers will become more understanding of the safety the government is providing rather than viewing it as a violation of privacy.
The sole purpose of this writing is to persuade and inform the society on the necessity of the security equipment, despite the hassle, and to educate those about the rising developments. Presently, high tech x- ray machines, metal detectors, body scanners, and pat downs are the methods implemented in order to greatly decrease the possibility of anything catastrophic happening within the airports or on board the aircraft. I have personally had to partake in this bothersome process, and I’m going to have to deal with the annoyance more often after I graduate as a Hospitality Management major.
The annoyance of the current process is not only cumbersome to me but especially to frequent flyers, nonetheless it remains extremely necessary. The aim of my extended argument examines the possible changes within airports so they can further protect us, the people, and lead to a more satisfactory client base. My proposition will mainly be directed towards my ENC1102 professor and my fellow classmates, as well as other common travelers, school teachers, adults, and our upcoming generation.
After extensive research for my exploration of both sides of the argument, I have found many reasons as to why we must partake in the elongated processes of airport check-ins, however, I foresee more effective, simpler, less violating new systems that are currently birthing. An airline officials reveals that “prior to 9/11, an average of 350 people would normally go through a checkpoint in an hour. Now the number is down to about 150 in one hour” (Jim Barnett). This background knowledge shows how evident of a change that needs to be instilled in the TSA’s methods.
The up and coming technology on the horizon is thermal lie detection which has the ability to detect different facial temperatures towards those who seem suspicious. Another enhancement is the “all in one” screening, a series of detectors equipped with eye-scanners, x-ray machines, metal and liquid detectors, which will surely speed up the process. These innovations will further be explained in detail in my upcoming extended writings. My further works will start off with explaining the controversy over airport security and its benefits and disadvantages.
First, there will be brief overview of the entire subject and an explanation as to why people are angered by this subject. Then, I will lead into further investigation on the topic and go into detail about the two different advances that will better help our airports. I will use research articles and descriptions of the product to better inform my reader. Finally, I will persuade readers that with less compromising systems travelers will soon turn understanding and be thankful towards the officials trying to keep them safe. This brings me to the conclusion of this plan leading to a better-rounded more satisfied consumer base.
This paper encumbers a full understanding of why a percentage of the population feel like their civil rights are being stripped away. In the past I would have agreed with them, but our world is a dangerous, frightening place, and all citizens must stand up to the plate and understand the actions taken by our government, like our parents, they do whatever they must do to protect us, their children. This act actually ensures us our freedom, to cross boarders freely with piece of mind; it definitely doesn’t take away our freedom or take away our civil rights. One must get off their high horse and face reality.
If we can implement this technology to make our processing time through the airport, more convenient, less harassing, less time consuming, and less degrading, most individuals will not feel so violated anymore. Eventually the process will be so simplistic and common that the negative feelings towards the TSA and our government will disappear and travelers will soon accept that the extensiveness of security and come to the realization that it’s only for their own good. With these security measures just on the horizon, we will no longer feel compromised and therefore become more comfortable and accustomed with the measures that need
to be taken in today’s world to continue living in the land of the free. The goal is to work towards a safer tomorrow for us and generations to come yet still maintaining the integrity given to us by our forefathers. Works Cited “American Civil Liberties Union. ” American Civil Liberties Union. N. p. , n. d. Web. 14 July 2013. Bajoria, Jayshree. “The Debate Over Airport Security. ” Council on Foreign Relations. Council ….. on Foreign Relations, 28 Dec. 2010. Web. 16 July 2013. “BalancedPolitics. org. ” – Civil Liberties/Patriot Act in Wartime (Pros & Cons, Arguments For ….. and Against, Advantages & Disadvantages). N. p.
, n. d. Web. 11 July 2013. Barnett, Jim. “A Speedier Trip through Airport Security Could Come within a Decade. “CNN. ….. Cable News Network, 01 Jan. 1970. Web. 22 July 2013. “Flying With Fish The Blog for Those Who Fly & Those Who Want to Fly Smarter. “Flying With ….. Fish RSS. N. p. , n. d. Web. 22 July 2013. PBS. Drastic Changes in Airport Security After 9/11 Stir Controversy. PBS, n. d. Web. 11 July ….. 2013 Shachtman, Noah. “Passenger Screening Policies Violate Privacy and Do Not Ensure ….. Security. ” US Airport Security. Ed. Margaret Haerens and Lynn M. Zott. Detroit: ….. Greenhaven Press, 2013. Opposing Viewpoints.
Rpt. from “Has Airport Security Gone Too ….. Far? ” Wall Street Journal 17 Nov. 2010. Opposing Viewpoints In Context. Web. 10 July ….. 2013. “The Patriot Act: Security Tool or Big Brother 2011. ” Berkeley Political Review. N. p. , n. d. Web. ….. 14 July 2013. “The Usa Patriot Act, a Controversial Public Policy, Julius Taka. ” – Term Papers. N. p. , n. d. ….. Web. 16 July 2013. Webster, George. “The Future of Airport Security: Thermal Lie-detectors and Cloned Sniffer ….. Dogs. ” CNN. Cable News Network, 25 Nov. 2011. Web. 22 July 2013 “Where Do You Stand on the Usa Patriot Act? ” – Essay. N. p. , n. d. Web. 16 July 2013.