In one of most powerful natural disasters in the 1900s, the Mississippi river flooded which caused severe damage around the states of Arkansas, Illinois, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Tennessee, Texas, Oklahoma, and Kansas. The flood was caused during a large rainfall that lasted approximately 18 hours; the rainfall caused an overflow in the Mississippi river that overtook the banks. This flood wreaked havoc amongst the citizens in its path.
The disaster caused over 400 million dollars’ worth of damage and 246 deaths. Back in 1927 new papers from every major city had stories all this over national disaster, like the Chicago Daily Tribune and the New York Times. Which both had very similar editorial stances, they both wrote about the political aspect of the major issue. Coverage of the government and how the intend to contribution to help this horrible situation at hand. In the Chicago Daily Tribune, they ran a headline stating,”200. 00 need help—Hoover. ” Hoover, at the time was Secretary of Commerce was urging President Coolidge that a larger relief fund was needed. (Chicago Daily Tribune).
The newspaper went on to discuss donations from the community to help aid the 200,000 people that needed help. Hoover collaborated with the Red Cross to relieve the people affected by the flood. The editorial stance that the Chicago Daily Tribune ran was political. In the New York Times, their headline was, “Congress to act on flood perils. The paper ran an article about Tennessee Senator McKellar taking action on the Mississippi flood issue. He states that, “The cost may stagger the economic imagination of some of my colleagues, but no matter what it is it will not be a fraction of the loss that has followed in the wake of the record-breaking deluge of 1927. I intend to call a conference of the Senators and Representatives of the Mississippi States to make a survey and, if possible, to draft legislation which will minimize the flood peril. ” (New York Times).