Haven't found the Essay You Want?
For Only $12.90/page

The Motivational Reasons behind Consumer Choice in Branded Coffee Shops Abstract Essay

The coffee-shop industry has been undergoing substantial change during the latter part of the twentieth and early part of the twenty-first century, reflected by continuous changes in consumer behaviour. The aim of this study is to improve the understanding of the motivational reasons behind customer choice in branded coffee shops, both international and local. A quantitative data collection of 300 questionnaires was used in the UK to assess consumer behaviour to branded coffee shops.

The findings concluded that most respondents visit coffee shops with friends, with locally branded coffee shops the preferred choice. Consumer motivations to branded coffee shops are most influenced by three factors: past experience/ familiarity; convenience of location/travel; and friends and family. With friendly staff, high quality of coffee and food, good atmosphere and good reputation the most important aspects for branded coffee shops. Recent exposure of tax avoidance from companies such as Starbucks have had negative influence on consumer choice of branded coffee shops.

Rapid developments and a monumental boom, the popularity of the contemporary coffee shop continues to grow in the twenty-first century. Starbucks entered the UK market in the 1990s (Bishop, 2012), which awakened a new era for branded coffee shops. Key Note (2012: 29) verifies that three major players exist; Costa, Starbucks and Caffé Nero, representing over 80% of branded coffee shops in the UK, confirming the power of international coffee brands. This major market penetration has been to the detriment of smaller, locally branded coffee shops, which struggle to compete (Bishop, 2012).

However, some news articles suggest that locally branded coffee shops, e.g. Cadwaladers, can survive, using the power and competitive advantage of the local market. Recent exposure of tax avoidance (see ‘Starbucks’ paid just £8.6m UK tax in 14 years’, BBC News 2012) questions the future influence of international coffee brands.

From analysis of the above it may be inferred that local and international branded coffee shops divide opinion. Reviewing literature of brand concepts, it is evident branding has been widely addressed (Butcher, 2005; Caruana, 2002; Schuiling and Kapferer, 2004; Young and Rubicam, 2000), and more especially, branding in the hospitality industry, (Allegra Strategies Report, 2012; Bashaw, Brumm and Davis, 2008; Bell, 2008; Chathoth and Olsen, 2003; George and Stefanos, 1999; Hanson et al., 2009; Hyun and Kim, 2011; Kim et al., 2003; Kim and Kim, 2004, 2005; Kim, Ma and Kim, 2005; Kwun and Oh, 2004; O’Neill and Mattila, 2010; Ruddick, 2012; Ryu et al., 2008; Wanke, Hermann and Schaffner, 2007), though it finds little research specifically concerning branded coffee shops.

Against the above background, the aim of this research is to improve understanding by providing an in-depth analysis of the motivational reasons behind customer choice in branded coffee shops, both local and international. This addresses the gap that exists within literature concerning branded coffee shops, especially regarding what factors influence customer behavior, perceptions and motivations to both local and international branded coffee shops in the UK.

Literature review
This review considers visitor motivation, theories of motivation in general, hospitality-specific and influential factors such as social influence, socio- demographics and branding, with particular focus on brand perceptions.

Visitor Motivation
Sharpley (2008) refers to motivation as a logical process that results from deep, psychological needs and motives or external forces and pressures; social relationships and lifestyle. Often unrecognised by an individual, it can kick-start the consumer decision-making process, to ‘reflect an individual’s private needs and wants’ (Pearce, 2005: 51). However, Witt and Wright (1992) argue that needs and desires may arouse motivated behaviour, meaning behaviour is not necessarily predicted, whereas Fodness (1994) claims motivation is the driving force in interpreting an individual’s behaviour.

A range of research is related to tourism motivation or visitor motivation (Cooper et al., 2005; Dann, 1977, 1981; Eagles, 1992; Fodness, 1994; Iso- Ahola, 1982; Krippendorf, 1986; MacCannell, 1989; Mathieson and Wall, 1982; McIntosh and Goeldner, 1990; Mill and Morrison, 1985; Moutinho, 1987; Pearce and Caltabiana, 1983; Pearce, 2005; Sharpley, 2008; Sims, 2009; Urry, 1990; Witt and Wright, 1992; Wolf, 2002). However, very little research is related to coffee shop visitor motivations.

Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs (1943), a theory of human motivation, provides a strong concept for consumer decision choice of branded coffee shops. Two constructs of this theory, i.e. ‘love and belonging’ support the desire to create a sense of connection. Witt and Bruce (1972) and Bearden and Etzel (1982), suggest individuals seek social approval, wanting to be ‘liked’ or ‘be like’ other individuals in society. The desire to achieve social security motivates individuals to choose the same brand as others, by external public observation or internal, social group attitudes. The power of the international brand as the ‘place to be seen’ creates a motivated behaviour choice.

Lewis (2012) argues that superficial desires and behaviours are less influential factors and basic needs are more common-human. Maslow’s concept of ‘psychological needs,’ the need for life basics, supports this alternative motivator, therefore the drive to satisfy thirst alone is another determinant for visiting a coffee shop. The study of needs provides a ‘partial explanation of motivated behaviour’ (Witt and Wright, 1992: 44), but according to Mill and Morrison (1985: 2) individuals are often unaware of the real reason for doing certain things, suggesting true motivations lie hidden in the subconscious. So other influential factors must be examined as reasons why people visit an international brand over a local branded coffee shop and vice-versa.

Influential Factors
Wolf (2006: 19) notes that ‘nearly 100% of tourists dine out while travelling, and food and beverage consistently rank first in visitor spending’, supported by Shenoy (2005). These findings suggest one explanation for the major growth of coffee shops in high-footfall leisure areas, with an increase in number of branded coffee shops to 3041 in the UK by 2009-10 (Bishop, 2012: 1).

Tourist typologies provide tourist/visitor behaviour differences, e.g. Brand Seekers, Convenience Tourists, Culinary Tourists, etc. Hall and Mitchell’s (2005) Taxonomy of Consumers can be used to classify the importance of food within their decision-making processes. Hall and Mitchell (2006: 147; Wolf, 2002) suggest a tourist may want to ‘taste’ the region they are visiting, with the culinary tourist (Shenoy, 2005), supporting motivated behaviour to a locally branded coffee shop. However, with many local coffee shops disappearing, this typology is questioned. Other influences like the power of a brand may alter ones attitudes and consequently change behaviour, research into brand power highlights this.

Perceptions are influenced by motivational push factors, e.g. socio-demographics, familiarity, security, social norms, prestige and peer pressure (Swarbrooke and Horner, 1999). Ajzen’s (1991) theory of planned behaviour examined how initial intentions and attitudes are affected by perceptions and account ‘for considerable variance in actual behaviour’ (Ajzen, 1991: 179).

Social Influence
Moutinho (1987) suggests 4 sources of social influence; family, social class, culture and reference groups. He argued these internal and external pressures were detrimental to behaviour when exerted on individuals. Thornton (2001) supports family as a powerful influence in tourist motivation. Merton (1957) and Rossi’s (1949) reference groups, describes the process when people adjust their attitudes and values to that of the reference group, e.g. product preferences (Burnkrant and Cousineau, 1975) and brand choice (Bourne, 1957; Stafford, 1966; Witt, 1969).

Bruce (1970,1972) finds reference group influence can spread to other consumers explaining behaviour of visitors to a new area, seeking information when uncertain (Bearden and Etzel, 1982). Another example derives from the need to seek social status and social approval (Witt and Bruce, 1972). The term value- expressive, is the need for psychological association with a person or group, to the liking of the reference group (Bearden and Etzel, 1982) and ‘need’ to be identified as using the same brand ‘publically consumed luxury’ (Bourne, 1957: 219). French and Raven’s (1959) propose 5 bases that explore how a social group derives power to exert influence.

Socio-demographics also determine behavior (Bishop, 2012: 55), e.g. major coffee chains were more popular among men (29.4%) than women (20.6%) compared to independents in the UK. Additionally 54.6% of 20- to 24-year-olds were most likely to choose a branded chain compared to 17.7% of those aged 65 years and over (Key Note, 2012). Consumer research by NEMS UK Market Research on behalf of Key Note (2012: 1) claim during the recession 30.7% of people cut back on visiting coffee/sandwich shops, with, consumers more attracted by outlets offering discounts (Allegra Strategies, 2012).

Mattila (2001) claims that social variables from the business perspective are critical for generating customer loyalty, e.g. social regard influenced new customers and perceived core service quality influenced existing customers (Butcher, 2005). Caruana (2002) recognises service qualities like customer satisfaction, results in service loyalty, while friendly behaviours in service interactions enhance business success (Bitner et al., 1990; Driver and Johnston, 2001; Hall, 1993; Iacobucci and Ostrom, 1993; Price and Arnould, 1999). Servicescape is also regarded as a critical factor. Wight (1996) argues the avoidance of crowds is important in explaining customer behaviour.

For this research a brand differentiates the international service/product from a local service/product. The brand is a powerful tool that attracts positive consumer behaviour, influencing perceptions and choice, i.e. purchase intention.

Wanke, Herrmann and Schaffner (2007) found that a brand name evokes specific associations, creating a brand perception e.g. ‘Starbucks’ – where ‘star’ may be interpreted as star quality and excellence, influencing consumers’ link with quality (Ginden, 1993). Berry et al. (1988) suggests a well-chosen name creates a marketing advantage and should include key characteristics i.e. simple, flexible, memorable, distinctive and relevant – e.g. ‘Costa’. Rooney (1995) suggests a brand name is a major asset, enhancing company success, generating consumer confidence (Assael, 1995) and active consumer behaviour (Assael, 1995; Meadows, 1983), as consumers perceive one brand as more desirable than its competitors (Rooney, 1995).

Chernatony and Dall’Olmo Riley (1998: 426) identified twelve themes associated with defining a brand, e.g. shorthand, risk reducer, identity system and image, influencing the consumers mind. Memory shortcuts (Jacoby et al., 1977) help speedier decision-making, advantageous for the time pressed consumer. The recognisable brand becomes the favoured choice (Chevan, 1992), as a distinguishable international brand satisfies demand expectations (Chernatony and Dall’Olmo Riley, 2010; Montgomery and Wernerfelt, 1992), so a brand relationship is established that may explain international brand market dominance.

Sweeney and Soutar (2001) suggest branded products have four consumption values that drive consumer purchase behaviour i.e. emotional, social, quality/performance and price/value for money. Explaining how one brand can differ from the next; international branded coffee shops may be perceived the best at delivering these values. The Customer-Based Brand Equity Model (Keller, 1993), conceptualises the idea that brand knowledge affects the consumer response, leading to a positive effect on consumer reactions, generating brand attitude (Tuominen, 1999; Yoo and Donthu, 2001).

Research has explored how past experience has the ability to influence and change buyer behaviour (Busch, 1980; Gaski, 1984a; MacKenzie and Zaichkowsky, 1981). Research found that power can influence aspects such as satisfaction (Bachman, 1968; Bachman, Smith, and Slesinger, 1966), attraction (French and Raven, 1959), conformity (Warren, 1968, 1969), and social influence (Lippitt, Polansky, and Rosen, 1952). Crosno et al.’s (2009) 5 Base Social Power Theory adapted from French and Raven’s (1959) original framework (appendix 1), found a brand wielding these concepts had a greater overall brand social power. These findings provide significant explanation to brand difference between international and local coffee shops.

An investigation by Tsai (2011) strengthened the Strategic Management of Service Brand Relationships Model, finding service brand commitment and love, influence relationship e.g. satisfaction, self-concept connection and finally trust. Research on the importance of building and achieving brand equity, loyalty and awareness exist, yet little investigation into consumer decision of branded coffee shops. Literature suggests quality perception was most important for determining brand purchase (Bao et al., 2011; Grewal et al., 1998; Richardson, 1994, 1996). This provides support for research into customer perceptions of coffee brands and how they influence our behaviours.

Local Brands vs. International Brands Schuiling and Kapferer (2004) argue with local brands’ adaptability and better response to local needs, e.g. flexibility of pricing strategy for specific local markets highlighting a significant difference to international brands, which lack intimate relationships with local markets (Schuiling and Kapferer, 2004). Their research on the differences found that local brands have a higher level of awareness (85%) than international brands (73%) linked by the number of years local brands have been in the market (Schuiling and Kapferer, 2004: 105). Their database revealed other variables suggesting local brand advantages, for example, as being trustworthy, reliable, good value, high quality and traditional (Table 3 in Schuiling and Kapferer, 2004: 105).

Local brands have the ability to create a brand value system (Chernatony and Dall’olmo Riley, 1998) by endorsing personal and cultural values (Engel, 1993; Reynolds and Gutman, 1988). Chernatony and Dall’olmo Riley (1998) argued that Brand Relationship and Brand Personality (Blackston, 1992) were
important for repeat custom and strong bonding, e.g. Cadwaladers, a local Welsh example, provide ‘distinct character’ and ‘culture’ of its destination (Jones and Jenkins, 2002: 116) and help establish a more unique selling proposition (Haven-Tang and Jones, 2006).

Evidence exists of community support for local brands to support, stimulate and revitalise local economy (Boyne, Hall and Williams, 2003), creating regional development (Hall, Kirkpatrick and Mitchell, 2005; Steinmetz, 2010) and preventing ‘cloning’ (Kelly, 2012). A case study by Patterson et al. (2010) highlights local brand power in Australia. Closing three quarters of Australian Starbucks, Australians continued to remain loyal the their own coffee brand Gloria Jeans.

Schuiling and Kapferer (2004) support local brands as the leading competitor, arguing the qualities and traits of local business have proven superior. They conclude that cost is responsible for local disadvantage, with inability to generate economies of scale. Schuiling and Kapferer (2004) argue that international brand development benefits from global marketing, e.g. portfolio enhancement, compared to local brands who lack global status (see Daily Mail, 2009). Schuiling and Kapferer (2004) suggest a balanced mix of local and international brand development is key to entire industry success.

The aim of this article is to improve our understanding by addressing the gap that exists within research and literature concerning branded coffee shops. Little research explores what factors influence customer behavior, perceptions and motivations to local and international branded coffee shops in the UK.

Given the nature of the research, formal quantitative data collection using questionnaires was deployed. Target market analysis highlighted the most prominent influential factors, internal and external motives (Gnoth, 1997) and push and pull factors (Swarbrooke and Horner, 1999). This establishes what factors influence consumer perceptions, behaviour and purchase intention, similar to the survey conducted by Boa et al. (2011). Providing explanation as to why branded coffee shops (local/international) maintain their position within their industry, this research addresses the lack of research in this field, benefiting coffee shop businesses seeking competitive advantage or improvement. Providing insight to customer attitudes and perceptions, it proposes realistic prospects for brands, like the Y&R Brand Asset Valuator (Young and Rubicam, 2010).

‘Surveys are, arguably, the most important source of information for tourism analysis, planning and decision making’ (Smith, 1995: 42). Questionnaires are components of survey work (Finn et al., 2000), its purpose here is to obtain reliable and valid data on the research subject (Finn et al., 2000). A street survey of 300 questionnaires was undertaken, covering a cross- section of the community (Veal, 1992). Allowing generalisation of similar socio-demographic areas, this survey size gives representative data of the population (Seale, 2004), compensating lack of sufficient response data and weakness of randomness (Prentice et al., 1998), e.g. population and ecological validity (Finn et al., 2000). Clearly there is likely to be differences in demographics in the Southern cities/areas covered for this research compared to larger, major cities/areas across the UK such as London.

Measures for the questionnaire are conceptualised from the secondary literature research, as discussed consultation of research literature like this facilitates internal validity (Finn et al., 2000). This identified deficiencies concerning consumer choice and behaviour to the branded coffee shop, reflecting research objectives for appropriate instrumentation and statistical treatment of data (Cohen et al., 2007).

The questionnaire (appendix 2) included a standardised set of questions, allowing all respondents to interpret them in the same way, establishing standardisation and control (Finn et al., 2000). A pilot study identified improvements to the questionnaire before being confirmed as reliable, removing ambiguity or bias (Finn et al., 2000).

Similarly to methodology by Bramwell (1998) and Prentice et al. (1998) this research was a non-probability sample of 300 shoppers, no sampling frame therefore is administered. Critics of this sampling argue that this method is weak, lacking randomness, approaching shoppers on an ad hoc basis (bias selection) inevitably means not everyone has an equal chance of being selected (Finn et al., 2000). To help overcome questionnaire distributer bias, a ‘first to pass’ system was used (Tourism and Recreation Research Unit, 1993).

Shopping centres, high streets and small town centres in various locations in the South West (e.g. Plymouth, Taunton) and South Wales (e.g. Cardiff, Penarth and Chepstow) were identified as valid target areas, where street surveys are natural settings (Bogdan and Biklen, 1992; Cohen et al., 2007; Lincoln and Guba, 1985). The aim was to target up to 50% of shoppers within these fields (according to capacity of area). A total of 10 days was allocated for research collection, to reach a total of 300 responses.

The procedure was validated and controlled by replicating each data-gathering activity, with the interviewer remaining neutral throughout the study, avoiding interviewer bias or the Halo Effect. Consent ensures content validity and reduces ethical implications (Cohen et al., 2007) while consequential validity was also confirmed; briefing participants their responses will not exceed the ‘capability of the research’ (Cohen et al., 2007: 140). This maximises interest and elicits a positive response rate (Brunt, 2012; Finn et al., 2000).

The research method allows for completed questionnaires suitable for coding and analysis by SPSS, enabling the study to be easily replicated. Cross-tabulation examined results and chi-square tests ‘measured how well the data fits the hypothesis’ (Gravetter and Wallnau, 2009: 611) i.e. testing for goodness of fit, measuring what it is supposed to measure confirms validity (Finn et al, 2000: 28), creating a descriptive statistical account to interpret and generalise reality.

Findings and discussion
This section presents the results of the questionnaire, analysing the
descriptive statistics to establish the independent variables and dependent variables:

Experience of coffee shops;
Coffee-drinking behaviour;
International vs local coffee shops;
Effects of tax avoidance.
Discussion reviews their linkages to the existing literature to determine if this new data supports or contradicts existing information.

Profile of the respondents
A large count for each gender was recorded, finding a higher degree of female respondents (55.7%). Their ages varied, with a large segment of the sample aged between 15 and 24 (42.3%).

The population of England is larger than Wales. Results from the 2011 census (Office for National Statistics, 2011) reveal that England has 53.0 million residents, compared to 3.1 million in Wales. Further reporting that ‘there were 27.6 million men and 28.5 million women in the two countries’ (Office for National Statistics, 2011: 4). Looking more specifically at the UK regions used for this research, the South West and Wales, a marginal population difference exits between these two regions (see table 6). However closer examination of the gender populations of these two regions are fairly similar (see tables 7 and 8), both regions see more females than males for people living to an older age. These statistics support findings regarding the higher female count found in this research.

Local coffee brands were the preferred type by respondents (53.7%) compared to international coffee brands (46.3%). Correlating with recent actions in Totnes (Kelly, 2012 – BBC News Magazine), this supports Schuiling and Kapferers’ (2004) assessment that local brands are the leading competitor. It also suggests that local brands may endorse stronger consumption values posit by Sweeney and Soutar (2001) to explain consumer purchase behaviour. Dismissing assumptions made within the literature review that international branded coffee shops could be perceived best at delivering these values.

Respondents reported they visit coffee shops predominately with friends (50.3%). Only 4.7% of respondents visited with work colleagues, suggesting escapism from daily routine by Iso-Ahola (1987) may explain why coffee shops are less likely to be visited with work colleagues, avoiding an association with work related activities. This sustains popular belief that coffee shops are a social activity, with behaviour socially influenced by friends or family (French and Raven, 1959).

Motivations to coffee shop
Table 3 presents motivations of the respondents to Coffee shop using a 1-5 Likert Scale

Analysis found that past experience/familiarity was the main reason why respondents were motivated to their chosen coffee shop (4.09). Confirming the influence of motivational push factors like familiarity and security (Swarbrooke and Horner, 1999), to satisfy expectations, meet private needs and wants (Pearce, 2005; Witt and Wright, 1992) and influence behaviour (Brand Social Power Theory, 2009; Busch, 1980; Crosno et al., 2009; French and Raven, 1958; Gaski, 1984a; Lippit et al., 1952; MacKenzie and Zaichkowsky, 1981; Warren, 1968, 1969). Confirming Brand Values are endorsed from personal experience with the brand subject (Bradley, 1995; Chernatony and McDonald, 1992; Clark, 1987; Doyle 1998; Jones, 1986; Tuominen, 1999), e.g. ‘Attachment of place’ (Phillips, 2013: 202), a principle Rowles (1978) and Smith (2009) claim is associated with exposure to a place.

The second highest motivation was convenience of location/ or travel (3.99), which supports convenience is an important consideration (Kim et al., 2005) and convenient location is more important than the brand (3.61) (Allegra Strategies, 2012). Friends and Family rated third strongest motivator (3.75), confirming friends and family are powerful motivators influencing behavior (Bearden and Etzel, 1982; Bourne, 1957; Burnkrant and Cousineau,
1975; Moutinho, 1987; Stafford, 1966; Thornton, 2001; Witt and Bruce, 1972 and Witt, 1969). This reinforces Merton and Rossi (1949) and Moutinho’s (1987) significance of ‘reference groups.’

That Strong local identity rated the weakest (3.31) may suggest that local identity does not have the same impact as that of the brand itself, e.g. marketing advantage (Berry et al., 1988), enhanced success (Rooney, 1995) or active consumer behaviour (Assael, 1995; Meadows, 1983). This suggests that promoting local identity in coffee shops may not significantly affect customer behavioural intentions.

International branded coffee shops vs local branded coffee shops A 1-5 Likert Scale was also used to identify what aspects were most important for both international coffee brands and local coffee brands, summarised in table 4 below. High quality of coffee/food was found the most important aspect (4.36) concerning international brands. Reinforcing perceived core service quality influenced existing customers (Butcher, 2005), similarly confirming Bao et al. (2011); Grewal et al. (1998) and Richardson (1994, 1996) that quality perception was most important for determining purchase. Rated second most important for an international brand was good reputation (4.08), confirming that social regard is a critical influencer (Butcher, 2005; Mattila, 2001).

Friendly staff was rated most important for local brands (4.37). These findings are consistent with Bitner et al., (1990); Driver and Johnston (2001); Hall, (1993); Iacobucci and Ostrom, (1993) and Price and Arnould, (1999); who found friendly behaviours between service and customer enhance business success. High quality of coffee/food rated second most important, as mentioned above consistent with Butcher (2005) and Mattila (2001). Good atmosphere was also considered important for local coffee shops (4.13), supporting Kotler (1973) that atmosphere is often the primary product to effect purchase decision, physical surroundings and environment are also influential (Gardner, 1985; Obermiller and Bitner, 1984 and Donovan and Rossiter, 1982).

Table 5 shows respondents’ attitude towards recent news claims regarding tax avoidance (centered around Starbucks). The results below confirm that a significant number of respondents were affected by the story (34%), claiming they would avoid using international chains in the future. Though 53.3% of respondents said it would have no effect, an additional 12.7% stated they were unsure of their future intentions.

This provides a case which represents how important brand equity (Aaker, 1991) is for building the product’s image (Clearly, 1981), value promotion to attract and keep customers (Rooney, 1995), positive image (Ginden, 1993), consumer generated image (Chernatony and Dall’olmo Riley, 1998), brand value (Park et al., 1994) and likings and perceptions (Moore, 1993). Damage to the brand can be critical; the findings demonstrate how negative brand exposure against Starbucks now evokes a negative association and brand perception (Wanke, Herrmann and Schaffner, 2007). This confirms the power of Keller’s Brand Equity Model (1993); brand knowledge can affect consumer response, suggesting it had hindered brand attitude (Tuominen, 1999; Yoo and Donthu, 2001).

Brand reputation (Romeo, Weinberger, and Antes 1994; Siomkos and Malliaris
1992) is a feature affected by consumer response to company crisis (Jorgensen, 1996). Jorgensen (1996) and Weiner’s model (1986) found the higher degree of responsibility and controllability a company was for said event the higher it elicit feelings of anger, effecting judgment, purchase and behaviour intentions (Jorgensen, 1994). The high number of respondents not affected could be explained using attitude strength, brand commitment and brand loyalty (Ahluwalia et al., 2000; Keller, 2003; Tuominen, 1999; Yoo and Donthu, 2001) i.e. brand equity (Aaker, 1991; 1992), confirming the importance of the Service Brand Relationship Model (Tsai, 2011).

Cross Tabulation and Chi-Square Tests studied the relationship between independent variables and dependent variables to determine whether a significant association between two variables existed (Brunt, 2012). This research revealed a number of significant associations existed, providing insight of consumer behaviour to coffee shops, discussed below.

A chi-square test between gender and 12 motivational items was carried out, which found one positive cross tabulation between women and ‘Popular and Thriving Atmosphere.’

This shows a significant association; women are more positively affected by servicescape (Gardener, 1985; Kotler, 1973; Obermiller and Bitner, 1984) and environment than men (Raajpoot et al., 2008). Popular and thriving maybe associated as busy, men are more negatively affected by waiting time than women (Grewal et al, 2003) which explains this gender association, suggesting Wight’s (1997) avoidance of crowds to explain behaviour is more prevalent in men than in women.

A chi-square test between age and 12 motivational items was carried out; 4 positive cross tabulations were found:

‘Age’ and ‘Support Local Brand’
The cross tab indicated that more people aged 65+ rated ‘support local brand’ as the strongest reason to coffee shop. Age groups ’15-24′ and ’25-44′ rated ‘possible’ highly. Most ages rate ‘support local brand’ highly as a
motivator to chosen coffee shop, though the older you are the stronger this motivates you. Approving Boyne, Hall and Williams (2003) that community support to stimulate and revitalise the local economy exits.

‘Age’ and ‘Avoids Crowds and Noise’
Age group ’65+’ rated avoiding crowds and noise strongly as a motivating factor. This test reveals the older you are the more avoiding crowds and noise motivates you when choosing a coffee shop. Supporting Day et al. ‘s (2000) Minimizing Sensory Overstimulation Theory, as suggested by Phillips’ (2013) study, older participants were startled by sudden, heavy or loud noises.

‘Age’ and ‘The Brand and Reputation’
This cross tab suggests that for ages ’25-44′, ’65+’ and ’15-24, Brand and Reputation was a strong motivator, confirming this does affect and influence a large majority of consumer motivations. These findings are consistent with those of Wanke, Herrmann and Schaffner (2007) that brands evoke perceptions, which can link with quality (Ginden, 1993) influencing consumer decisions. Findings support brands make memory shortcuts (Jacoby et al., 1977), which create consumer confidence (Assael, 1995) and active consumer behaviour (Assael, 1995; Crosno et al., 2009; Meadows, 1983).

‘Age’ and ‘Somewhere New/Different’
The cross tab indicated that somewhere new/different rated a high motivator among respondent, thus an influential factor in consumer coffee shop decisions. This is consistent to the framework created by Pearce and Caltabiano (1983) and Sharpley (2008) whom signify biological and social motives change over time. Social changes influence behaviour, i.e. consumer taste and style changes (Moutinho, 1987; Rooney, 1995) and social influences are motivators found by Dann (1977); Iso-Ahola (1987) and McIntosh and Goeldner (1990). The findings agree with Bearden and Etzel (1982) and Witt and Bruce (1972) that social security and social approval motivates human behaviour.

A further test found a significant association existed between age and preferred coffee shop. The two youngest ages groups 15-24 and 25-44 were found to prefer international branded coffee shops more than local branded coffee shops, supporting Key Note (2012), compared to the two oldest age groups 45-64 and 65+, which found a higher preference for local brands.

Conclusion and implications
Reviewing this exploratory study, we suggest that consumer motivations to branded coffee shops are influenced by the following three factors: past experience/familiarity, convenience of location, and friends and family. This research reveals that social influence is a strong motivator in consumer choice and purchasing behaviours to branded coffee shops. This research also identified some similarities between factors perceived most important from the consumer perspective for local and international coffee brands. The most important factors for a local coffee brand were, in order, friendly staff, high quality of coffee and food and good atmosphere. Whereas the most important factors for an international coffee brand were, in order, high quality of coffee and food, good reputation and friendly staff. Respondents indicated high quality coffee and food and friendly staff were important for both branded coffee shops.

The results of this research exposes that a difference between coffee brand preference and influential factors exists. The following section presents practical implications for businesses or individuals within the branded coffee shop industry.

This research identified that a strong liking for coffee shops exists, with local brands the preferred coffee brand choice. The difference between important factors suggests it contributes and influences consumer coffee brand preference, motivations and behaviours. So to understand the motivational reasons behind consumer choices in branded coffee shops the consideration of these factors is necessary. Differentiating the local brand from the international brand, the results suggest local brands endorse a more personal relationship compared to the professional, quality relationship found from international brands. These findings provide additional theory on the power of social influence from the consumer and business perspective as a motivator to branded coffee shops, i.e. perceptions and social brand power.

In addition, this research reveals that significant associations did exist between motivation and social demographics such as age and gender; e.g. women were more motivated by the popular and thriving atmosphere of the branded coffee shop than men. Whereas age presented larger differences between motivations e.g. ‘support local brand’, ‘avoid crowds/noise’, ‘somewhere new/different’ and ‘brand and reputation’. This research could be used for coffee shop businesses seeking to target a specific audience.

Regarding tax avoidance, results from a specific question (see appendix 2, Question 7 and table 5) illustrated that consumer attitude was affected and that it negatively influenced future decisions, motivations and behaviours towards all internationally branded coffee shops, especially Starbucks itself. Detrimental to the brand reputation, this draws attention to the importance of maintaining a good reputation for successful coffee shop businesses.

The findings suggest theories and literature on brands, motivation and influential factors is applicable to branded coffee shops, e.g. theory concerning local brands as leading competitors endorsing qualities and traits superior to those of international brands. Quality perception is important for determining brand purchase and can explain consumer behaviour to branded coffee shops.

This research addresses the gap that exists within literature concerning branded coffee shops, especially regarding local brands and their ability to influence consumer perceptions. Little research explores what factors influence customer behaviour, perceptions and motivations to local and international branded coffee shops in the UK, therefore this research creates a foundation for others to explore and develop further. Given the rise in interest and boom of the coffee shop industry in recent times, this provides market research consideration for new start ups in the tourism and beverage industry in the future. A multi methods approach using an in-depth
interview could improve understanding and explore customer attitudes further. A comparison of consumer preferences across different countries could also reveal whether cultural differences influence decisions.

Limitations to this study exist, e.g. the sample selection was taken from the South West and South Wales and other UK regions were not explored, meaning a holistic mix of social demographic across the UK is not confirmed. Likewise, an equal count for each age group and gender was not achieved. A larger study may discover a difference between gender and preference of branded coffee shop, or whether significant associations exist between age and importance of aspects, which chi-square tests in this study could not validate due an insufficient sample size. Clearly the results demonstrate coffee shops are an integral part of popular British culture and this research presents findings to support this theory.

I would like to take this opportunity to express my profound gratitude and appreciation to my guide, Professor Rong Huang, for her exemplary guidance, monitoring, constant encouragement and kindness. Her support and time has been invaluable and inspiring throughout the development of this article.

I would also like to take this opportunity to thank Professor Graham Busby for the valuable information provided by him in his respective field. I am grateful for his support.

Lastly, I would like to thank my parents, brother and friends for their constant encouragement, support, care and kindness throughout this entire process.

Appendix 1: French and Raven’s (1959) power typology
Legitimate power is based on the perception of an individual that another person has the legitimate right to influence him or her, and that he or she is obligated to accept the influence.

Reward power is based on the perception of an individual that another person has the ability to reward him or her.

Coercive power is based on the perception of an individual that another person has the ability to punish him or her.

Expert power is based on the perception of an individual that another person has some specialized knowledge or expertise.

Referent power is based on an individual’s identification with, and desire to be similar to, another person.

Crosno et al. (2009:93)

Appendix 2: Questionnaire

Appendix 4: Questionnaire

Appendix 3:
Table 6: 2011 Census – The populations for English Regions and Wales

Table 6: 2011 Census – The populations for English Regions and Wales (Office for National Statistics, 2011:22).

Table 7: The Population of Wales 1999-2009 by age and gender

Table 7: The Population of Wales 1999-2009 by age and gender (Office for National Statistics – Statistics for Wales, 2010:3)

Table 8: The Population of the South West by age and gender

Table 8: The Population of the South West by age and gender (Smith, 2010:47)

[1] Sophie Burge has recently been awarded a First Class BSc Honours Degree in Business and Tourism at the University of Plymouth. Sophie is now looking to pursue her career around the world.

Aaker, D. (1991), Managing Brand Equity – Capitalizing On The Value Of A Brand Name, New York: Simon and Schuster

Aaker, D. (1992), ‘The Value of Brand Equity’, Journal of Business Strategy, 4, 27-32

Ahluwalia, R., R.E. Burnkrant and H.R. Unnava (2000), ‘Consumer Response to Negative Publicity: The Moderating Role of Commitment’, Journal of Marketing Research, 37 (2), 203-14

Ajzen, I. (1991), ‘The Theory of Planned Behaviour’, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 50 (1), 179-211

Allegra Strategies Ltd. (2012), The UK Restaurant Sector Report

Assael, H. (1995), Consumer behavior and marketing action, Cincinnati: South-Western College Publishing

Bachman, J. G. (1968), ‘Faculty satisfaction and the dean’s influence: An organizational study of twelve liberal arts colleges’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 52, 55-61

Bachman, J. G., C. G. Smith and J. A. Slesinger (1966), ‘Control, performance and satisfaction’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 127-36

Bao, Y., Y. Bao and S. Sheng (2011), ‘Motivating purchase of private brands: Effects of store image, product signatureness, and quality variation’, Journal of Business Research, 64, 220-26

Bashaw, R. E., J. Brumm and L. R. Davis (2008), ‘The Down Home Café’, Journal of Business Case Studies, 4 (5), 27-44

BBC News (2012), Starbucks ‘paid just £8.6m UK tax in 14 years’, available at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-19967397, accessed 1 July 2013

Bearden, W. and M. Etzel (1982), ‘Reference group influence on product and brand purchase decisions’, Journal of Consumer Research, 9 (1), 183-94

Bell, C. (2008), ‘100% PURE New Zealand: Branding for back-packers’, Journal of Vacation Marketing, 14 (4), 345-55

Berry, L. L., E. Lefkowith and T. Clark (1988), ‘In services, what’s in a name’, Harvard Business Review, 66, 28-30

Bishop, L. (2012), ‘Coffee and Sandwich Shops’, in Key Note, Market Assessment 2012, 7th Edition

Bitner, M. J., B. H. Booms and M. S. Tetreault (1990), ‘The service encounter: diagnosing favorable and unfavorable incidents’, Journal of
Marketing, 54, 71-84

Blackston, M. (1992), ‘Observations: building brand equity by managing the brand’s relationships’, Journal of Advertising Research, 32, 79-83

Bogdan, R. and S. K. Biklen (eds) (1992), Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theory and Methods, Boston: Allyn and Bacon

Bourne, F. S. (1957), ‘Group Influence in Marketing and Public Relations’, in R. Likert and S. P. Hayes (eds), Some Applications of Behavioral Re- search, Basel, Switzerland: UNESCO

Boyne, S., D. Hall and F. Williams (2003), ‘Policy, support and promotion for food related tourism initiatives: A marketing approach to regional development’, in C. M. Hall (ed.), Wine, Food and Tourism Marketing, New York: Haworth Hospitality Press pp. 131-54

Bradley, F. (1995), Marketing Management. Providing, Communicating and Delivering Value. London: Prentice Hall

Bramwell, B. (1998), ‘User satisfaction and product development in urban tourism’, Tourism Management, 19 (1), 35-47

Bruce, G. D. (1970), ‘Purchase Decisions and Group Influence’, Journal of Marketing Research, 7, 533-35

Bruce, G. D. (1972), ‘Group Influence and Brand Choice Congruence’, Journal of Marketing Research, 9, 440-43

Brunt, P. (2012), ‘SPSS 20 An Introduction’, University of Plymouth

Burnkrant, R. E. and A. Cousineau (1975), ‘Informational and Normative Social Influence in Buyer Behavior’, Journal of Consumer Research, 2, 206-15

Busch, P. (1980), ‘The sales manager’s bases of social power and influence
upon the sales force’, Journal of Marketing, 44, 91-101

Butcher, K. (2005), ‘Differential impact of social influence in the hospitality encounter’, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 17 (2), 125-35

Caruana, A. (2002), ‘Service loyalty: The effects of service quality and the mediating role of customer satisfaction’, European Journal of Marketing, 36 (7), 811-28

Chathoth, P. K. and M. D. Oslen (2003), ‘Strategic alliances: a hospitality industry perspective’, International Journal of Hospitality Management, 22 (4), 419-34

Chernatony, L. and F. Dall’Olmo Riley (1998), ‘Defining A ‘Brand’: Beyond The Literature With Experts’ Interpretations’, Journal of Marketing Management, 14 (5), 417-43

Chernatony, L. and M. McDonald (1992), Creating Powerful Brands. The Strategic Route to Success in Consumer, Industrial and Service Markets, Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann,18-19

Chevan, H. (1992), ‘What’s in a name?’, Catalog Age, 9 (9), 28

Clark, H. F. (1987), ‘Consumer and Corporate Values: Yet Another View

on Global Marketing’, International Journal of Advertising, 6 (1), 29-42

Clearly, D. P. (1981), Great American brands: The success formulas that made them famous, New York: Fairchild Publications

Cohen, L., L. Manion and K. Morrison (eds) (2007), Research Methods in Education, Oxon: Taylor and Francis, 133-51

Cooper, C., J. Fletcher, A. Fyall, D. Gilbert and S. Wanhill (eds) (2005),
Tourism: Principles and Practice, Harlow: Pearson Education

Crosno, J. L., T. H. Freling and S. J. Skinner (2009), ‘Does Brand Social Power Mean Market Might? Exploring the Influence of Brand Social Power on Brand Evaluations’, Journal of Psychology and Marketing, 26 (2), 91-121

Daily Mail (2009), ‘Britain’s biggest coffee chains promise to cut salt and fat in snacks and drink’, available at http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-1159948/Britains-biggest-coffee-chains-promise-cut-salt-fat-snacks-drinks.html, accessed 29 October 2012

Dann, G. (1977), ‘Anomie, Ego – Enhancement and Tourism’, Annals of Tourism Research, 4 (4), 184-94

Dann, G. (1981), ‘Tourist Motivation: An appraisal’, Annals of Tourism Research, 8 (2), 187-219

Day, K., D. Carreon and C. Stump (2000), ‘The Therapeutic design of environments for people with dementia: a review of the empirical research’, The Gerontologist, 40 (4), 397-416

Donovan, R. J. and J. R. Rossiter (1982), ‘Store Atmosphere: An Environmental Psychology Approach’, Journal of Retailing, 58 (1), 34-57

Doyle, P. (1998), Marketing Management and Strategy, London: Prentice Hall

Driver, C. and R. Johnston (2001), ‘Understanding service customers: the value of hard and soft attributes’, Journal of Service Research, 4 (2), 130-39

Eagles, P. (1992), ‘The Travel Motivations of Canadian Ecotourists’, Journal of Travel Research, 31 (2), 2-13

Engel, J. F., R. D. Blackwell and P. W. Miniard (1993), Consumer Behavior, Fort Worth: The Dryden Press

Finn, M., M. Elliott-White and M. Walton (2000), Tourism and Leisure Research Methods, Data Collection, Analysis and Interpretation, London: Pearson Education

French, J. R. P. and B. Raven (1959), ‘The bases of social power’, in D. Cartwright (ed.), Studies in social power, Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, pp. 150-67

Fodness, D. (1994), ‘Measuring tourist motivation’, Annals of Tourism Research, 21 (3), 555-81

Gardner, M. P. (1985), ‘Mood States and Consumer Behaviour: A Critical Review’, Journal of Consumer Research, 12, 281-300

Gaski, J. F. (1984), ‘The theory of power and conflict in channels of distribution’, Journal of Marketing, 48, 9-29

George, B. and V. Stefanos (1999), ‘Some attitudinal predictors of home-shopping through the Internet’, Journal of Marketing Management, 15 (5), 361-85

Ginden, R. (1993), ‘The name game’, Cheers, 59-62

Gnoth, J. (1997), ‘Motivation and Expectation Formation’, Annals of Tourism Research, 24 (2), 283-304

Gravetter, F. J. and L. B. Wallnau (eds) (2007), Statistics for the Behavioural Sciences, America: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning

Grewal, D., R. Krishnan, J. Baker and N. Borin (1998), ‘The Effect of Store Name, Brand Name and Price Discounts on Consumers’ Evaluations and Purchase Intentions’, Journal of Retailing, 74 (3) 331-52

Hall, E. J. (1993), ‘Smiling, deferring, and flirting’, Work and Occupations,
20 (4), 452-71

Hall, D., I. Kirkpatrick and M. Mitchell (2005), Rural Tourism and Sustainable Business, Clevedon: Channel View Publications

Hall, C. M., and R. Mitchell (2005), ‘Gastronomic tourism: Comparing food and wine tourism experiences’, in Novelli. M. (ed.), Niche tourism: Contemporary issues, trends and cases, Oxford: Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann, pp. 73-88

Hall, C. M., and R. Mitchell (2006), ‘Gastronomy, food and wine tourism’, in Buhalis, D. and C. Costa (eds), Tourism business frontiers: Consumers, products and industry, London: Butterworth Heinemann, pp.137-48

Hanson, B., A. S. Mattila, J. W. O’Neill and Y. Kim (2009), ‘Hotel Rebranding and Rescaling; Effects on Financial Performance’, Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 50 (3), 360-70

Haven-Tang, C. and E. Jones (2006), ‘Using local food and drink to differentiate tourism destinations through a sense of place’, Journal of Culinary Science and Technology, 4 (4), 69-86

Hyun, S. S. and W. Kim (2011), ‘Dimensions of Brand Equity in the Chain Restaurant Industry’, Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 52 (4), 429-37

Iacobucci, D. and A. Ostrom (1993), ‘Gender differences in the impact of core and relational aspects of services on the evaluation of service encounters’, Journal of Consumer Psychology, 2 (3), 257-86

Iso-Ahola, S. (1982), ‘Toward a Social Psychological Theory of Tourism Motivation: A rejoinder’, Annals of Tourism Research, 9 (2), 256-62

Jacoby, J., G. Szybillo and J. Busato-Schach (l977), ‘Information acquisition behaviour in brand choice situations’, Journal of Consumer Research, 3, 209-16

Jones, J. (1986), What’s in a Name? Advertising and the Concept of Brands, Aldershot: Gower Publishing, 30-31

Jones, A. and I. Jenkins (2002), ‘A taste of Wales – Blas Ar Gymru: Institutional malaise in promoting Welsh food tourism products’, in Hjalager. A. and G. Richards (eds), Tourism and gastronomy, London: Routledge, pp. 115-31

Jorgensen, B. K. (1994), ‘Consumer Reaction to Company-Related Disasters: The Effect of Multiple Versus Single Explanations,’ in Allen, C.T. and J. D. Roedder (eds) Advances in Consumer Research, 21, Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, pp. 348-52

Jorgensen, B. K. (1996), ‘Components of Consumer Reaction to Company-Related Mishaps: a Structural Equation Model Approach’, Advances in Consumer Research, 23 (1), 346-51

Keller, K. L. (1993) ‘Conceptualising, Measuring and Managing Customer-Based Brand Equity’, Journal of Marketing, 57 (1), 1-22

Kelly, J. (2012), ‘The independent coffee republic of Totnes’, available at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-19146445, accessed 12 Nov 2012

Kim, H. B., W. G. Kim and J. A. An (2003), ‘The effect of consumer-based brand equity on firms’ financial performance’, Journal of Consumer Marketing, 20 (4), 335-51

Kim, H. B. and W. G. Kim (2004), ‘Measuring Customer-Based Restaurant Brand Equity’, Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 45 (2) 115-31

Kim, H. B. and W. G. Kim (2005), ‘The relationship between brand equity and firms’ performance in luxury hotels and chain restaurants’, Journal of Tourism Management, 26 (4), 549-60

Kim, W. G., X. Ma and D. J. Kim (2005), ‘Determinants of Chinese hotel
customers’ e-satisfaction and purchase intentions’, Journal of Tourism Management, 27, 890-900

Kotler, P. (1973), ‘Atmosphere as a marketing tool’, Journal of Retailing, 49 (4), 48-64

Krippendorf, J. (1986), ‘Tourism In the System of Industrial Society’, Annals of Tourism Research, 13 (4), 517-32

Kwun, J. W. and H. Oh (2004), ‘Effects of Brand, Price, and Risk on Customers’ Value Perceptions and Behavioral Intentions in the Restaurant Industry’, Journal of Hospitality and Leisure Marketing, 11 (1), 31-49

Lewis, K. J. (2012), ‘Maslow’s Hierarchy of needs. Research History’, available at http://www.researchhistory.org/2012/06/16/maslows-hierarchy-of-needs/, accessed 14 Nov 2012

Lincoln, Y. S. and E. G. Guba (1985), Naturalistic Inquiry, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications

Lippitt, R., N. Polansky and S. Rosen (1952), ‘The dynamics of power: A field study of social influence in groups of children’, Human Relations, 5, 37-64

MacCannelll, D. (ed.) (1989), The Tourist: A New Theory of the Leisure Class, New York: Shocken Books

MacKenzie, S. B. and J. L. Zaichkowsky (1981), ‘An analysis of alcohol advertising using French and Raven’s theory of social influence’, Advances in Consumer Research, 8, 708-12

Maslow, A. H. (1943), ‘Theory of Human motivation’, Psychological Review, 50, 370-96

Mathieson, A. and G. Wall (1982), Tourism: Economic, Physical and Social
Impacts, Harlow: Longman

Mattila, A. S. (2001), ‘The Impact of Relationship Type on Customer Loyalty in a Context of Service Failures’, Journal of Service Research, 4 (2), 91-101

McIntosh, R. and C. Goeldner (1990), Tourism: Principles, Practices and Philosophies, New York: Wiley

Meadows, R. (1983), ‘They consume advertising too’, Admap, pp. 408-13

Merton, R. (1957), ‘Continuities in the Theory of Reference Groups and Social Structure’, in Merton, R. K. (ed.), Social Theory and Social Structure, New York: The Free Press, pp. 281-368

Mill, R. and A. Morrison (1985), The Tourism System, New Jersey: Prentice Hall International

Moore, J. (1993), ‘Building Brands Across Markets: Cultural Differences in Brand Relationships within the European Community’, in Aaker, D. and A. L. Biel (eds), Brand Equity and Advertising, Advertising’s Role in Building Strong Brands, Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 31-49

Montgomery, C. and B. Wernerfelt (1992), ‘Risk reduction and umbrella branding’, Journal of Business, 65, 31-50

Moutinho, L. (1987), ‘Consumer Behaviour in Tourism’, European Journal of Marketing, 21 (10), 5-44

Obermiller, C., and M. J. Bitner (1984), ‘Store atmosphere: a peripheral cue for product evaluation’ in American Psychological Association, Annual Conference Proceedings, Washington, DC

Office for National Statistics (2010), ‘Wales Population, A Demographic Overview 2010’, in Welsh Assembly Government Statistics for Wales, Cardiff: National Statistics 3

Office for National Statistics (2011), ‘2011 Census: Key Statistics for England and Wales, March 2011’, available at http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/dcp171778_290685.pdf., accessed 25 June 2013

Office for National Statistics. (2011), ‘2011 Census – Population and Household Estimates for England and Wales, March 2011’, available at http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/dcp171778_270487.pdf., accessed 25 June 2013

O’Neill, J. W. and A. S. Mattila (2010), ‘Hotel Brand Strategy’, Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 51 (1), 27-34

Park, C., D. Whan and V. Srinivasan (1994), ‘A Survey-Based Method for Measuring and Understanding Brand Equity and Its Extendibility’, Journal of Marketing Research, 2, 271-88

Patterson, P. G., J. Scott and M. D. Uncles (2010), ‘How the local competition defeated a global brand: The case of Starbucks’, Australasian Marketing Journal, 18, 41-47

Pearce, P. and M. Caltabiano (1983), ‘Inferring Travel Motivations from Travellers Experiences’, Journal of Travel Research, 22, 16-20

Pearce, P. (2005), Tourist Behaviour: Themes and Conceptual Schemes, Clevedon: Channel View Publications

Phillips, J. (2013), ‘Older People Use of Unfamiliar Space’, in Rowles, G. D. and M. Bernard (eds), Environmental Gerontology. Making Meaningful Places in Old Age, America: Springer Publishing Company, pp. 199-222

Prentice, R. C., S. F. Witt and C. Hamer (1998), ‘Tourism as experience: the case of heritage parks’, Annals of Tourism Research, 25 (1), 1-24

Price, L. L. and E. J. Arnould (1999), ‘Commercial friendships: service provider-client relationships in context’, Journal of Marketing, 63 (4),

Raajpoot, N. A., A. Sharma and J. C. Chebat (2008), ‘The role of gender and work status in shopping center patronage’, Journal of Business Research, 61 (8), 825-33

Reynolds, T. J. and J. Gutman (1988), ‘Laddering theory, method, analysis and interpretation’, Journal of Advertising Research, 28, 11-31

Richardson, P. S., A. S. Dick and A. K. Jain (1994), ‘Extrinsic and intrinsic cue effects on perceptions of store brand quality’, Journal of Marketing, 58, 28-36

Richardson, P. S., A. K. Jain and A. S. Dick (1996), ‘Household store brand proneness: a framework’, Journal of Retail, 72 (2), 159-85

Romeo, J., M. G. Weinberger and D. Antes (1994), ‘An Investigation of the Communication Cues that Affect Consumers’ Responses to Negative Product Safety News’, working paper, Research Centre for Consumer Behaviour, England: The University of Birmingham

Rooney, J. A. (1995), ‘Branding: a trend for today and tomorrow’, Journal of Product and Brand Management, 4 (4), 48-55

Rossi, A. K. (1949), ‘Contributions to the Theory of Reference Group Behavior’, in Merton, R. K. (ed.) Social Theory and Social Structure, New York: The Free Press, pp. 225-75

Rowles, G. D. (1978), Prisoners of space: Exploring the geographical experience of older people, Boulder, CO: Westview Press

Ruddick, P. (2012), ‘Branded chains and fast food concepts to lead eating out sector growth’, available at http://www.bighospitality.co.uk/Business/Branded-chains-and-fast-food-concepts-to-lead-eating-out-sector-growth, accessed 25 October 2012

Ryu, K., H. Han and T. H. Kim (2008), ‘The relationships among overall quick-casual restaurant image, perceived value, customer satisfaction, and behavioral intentions’, International Journal of Hospitality Management, 27 (3), 459-69

Schuiling, I. and J. N. Kapferer (2004), ‘Executive Insights: Real differences Between Local and International Brands: Strategic Implications for International Marketers’, Journal of International Marketing, 12 (4), 97-112

Seale, C. (2004), Researching society and culture, London: Sage

Sharpley, R. (2008), ‘Tourism and Tourist Motivation’, in ELM Publications (ed.), Tourism, Tourists and Society, Cambridgeshire: Elm Publications, pp. 5.1-5.26

Shenoy, S. S. (2005), Food Tourism and the Culinary Tourist, America: Clemson University, 1-420

Sims, R. (2009), ‘Food, place and authenticity: local food and the sustainable tourism experience’, Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 17 (3), 321-36

Siomkos, G. J. and P. G. Malliaris (1992), ‘Consumer Response to Company Communications During a Product Harm Crisis’, Journal of Applied Business Research, 8, 59-65

Smith, A. (2009), Ageing in urban neighbourhoods: Place attachment and social exclusion, Bristol: Policy Press

Smith, E. (2010), ‘Regional Trends 42 – Office for National Statistics’, in Office for National Statistics, Portrait of the South West, pp. 43-59

Smith, S. L. J. (1995), Tourism Analysis: A Handbook, Harlow: Longman

Stafford, J. E. (1966), ‘Effects of Group Influence on Consumer Brand Choice Preference’, Journal of Marketing Research, 3, 68-75

Steinmetz, R. (2010), ‘Food, Tourism and Destination Differentiation: The Case of Rotorua, New Zealand’, School of Hospitality and Tourism, University of Auckland

Swarbrooke, J. and S. Horner (1999), Consumer behaviour in tourism: Elsevier, 3-425

Sweeney, J. C. and G. N. Soutar (2001), ‘Consumer Perceived Value: The Development of a Multiple Item Scale’, Journal of Retailing, 77 (2), 203-20

Thornton, A. (2001), ‘The developmental paradigm, reading history sideways, and family change’, Demography, 38 (4), 449-65

Tourism and Recreation Research Unit (1993), Recreation Site Survey Manual: Methods and Techniques for Conducting Visitor Surveys, London: E and F Spon

Tsai, S. P. (2011), ‘Strategic Relationship Management and Service Brand Marketing’, European Journal of Marketing, 45 (7), 1194-1213

Tuominen, P. (1999), ‘Managing Brand Equity’, School of Economics and Business Administration, 65-100

Urry, J. (1990), The Tourist Gaze, London: Sage Publications

Veal, A. J. (1992), Research Methods for Leisure and Tourism: A Practical Guide, London: Longman

Wanke, M., A. Herrmann and D. Schaffner (2007), ‘Brand Name Influence on Brand Perception’, Journal of Psychology and Marketing, 24 (1), 1-24

Warren, D. I. (1968), ‘Power, visibility, and conformity in formal
organizations’, American Sociological Review, 33, 951-70

Warren, D. I. (1969), ‘The effects of power bases and peer groups on conformity in formal organizations’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 14, 544-56

Wight, P. (1996), ‘North American Ecotourism Markets: Motivations, Preferences and Destinations’, Journal of Travel Research, 35 (1) 3-10

Witt, R. E. and G. D. Bruce (1972), ‘Group Influence and Brand Choice Congruence’, Journal of Marketing Research, 7, 533-35

Witt, R. E. (1969), ‘Informal Social Group Influence on Consumer Brand Choice’, Journal of Marketing Research, 6, 473-77

Witt, C. and P. Wright (1992), ‘Tourist Motivation: Life after Maslow’, in Johnson. P. and B. Thomas (eds), Choice and Demand in Tourism, London: Mansell Publishing: pp. 33-55

Wolf, E. (2002), ‘Culinary tourism: A tasty economic proposition’, International Culinary Tourism Association, available at http://www.culinarytourism.org., accessed 15 November 2012

Wolf, E. (2006), Culinary tourism: The hidden harvest, Iowa: Kendall Hunt Publishing

Yoo, B. and N. Donthu (2001), ‘Developing and validating multidimensional consumer based brand equity scale’, Journal of Business Research, 52 (1), 1-14

Young and Rubicam (2010), ‘Brand Asset Valuator. The Worlds Biggest Brand Database’, available at http://young-rubicam.de/tools-wissen/tools/brandasset-valuator/?lang=en, accessed 2 December 2012

Essay Topics:

Sorry, but copying text is forbidden on this website. If you need this or any other sample, we can send it to you via email. Please, specify your valid email address

We can't stand spam as much as you do No, thanks. I prefer suffering on my own